Last night I had a wonderful experience: I attended an intelligently adapted and wonderfully acted version of Jane Austen’s Mansfield Park in the only remaining working Regency theatre in England.
Tim Luscombe’s adaptation of Mansfield Park is fast-paced, intelligent and witty, retaining the best of the dialogue and action from Jane Austen’s novel. Mr Luscombe has good form regarding Jane Austen. He has previously adapted Northanger Abbey and Persuasion and is an avowed admirer of her. As he writes in the play’s Programme Notes ( which include the full text of his adaptation) it is very difficult to omit characters and scenes :
Its hard cutting Jane Austen. I adapt her because I love her work. And so anything that goes is a little death, but a play is a very practical thing. It costs money. It can’t be so long that the audience miss the last bus home, and there is always a limit on the number of actors you can expect a theatre to employ…
Some characters were retained but never appeared, living their lives off-stage: Dr and Mrs Grant and Lady Bertram were relegated in this way. A pity, especially as I’m sure Mr Lucsombe would have had some fun with Lady Bertram’s languorous but occasionally lucid character. However, the constant refrain that “Mother is upstairs with a light headache‘ was very amusing, and I don’t think I was alone, last night, in wanting to join in the oft-repeated phrase. The roles of Julia and Mr Yates were omitted completely.
Geoff Arnold, above, who played Tom Bertram, William Price and Mr Rushworth, was excellent. Each character was completely different, in both speech and posture. His Mr Rushworth was a complete triumph, and took over Mr Yates’ role in one of my favourite scenes from the novel, where he is found “ranting ” on the “stage” in Sir Thomas’ study.
Henry and Mary Crawford were excellent; sophisticated beings causing havoc in the rural backwater of rich but repressed Mansfield. The gasp of horror from the audience when Henry announced that he wanted to make a tiny hole in Fanny Prices’ heart was wonderful to behold. Many in the audience seemed to have fallen for Henry’s charms…up to that point. Which is, I suppose exactly as Jane Austen would have wanted it to be.

Kristin Atherton as Mary Crawford, Ffion Jolly as Fanny and Pete Ashmore as Edmund Bertram ©Theatre Royal Bury St Edmunds
Fion Jolly was a great Fanny. Her reactions to the goings on around her were fabulously portrayed. But the award for best performance, to my mind at least, must be made to Pete Ashmore as Edmund. Edmund is, as you know, a tricky role for anyone to play. The urge to slap him, when reading the book, is often never far away. He can be kind but annoying, and an actor not attuned to playing him as a flawed but genuine and serious human, not as a paragon, will lose our sympathy very quickly. Last night we saw a manly, kind, upright but ever-so-slightly flawed Edmund. I didn’t want to slap him very often, if at all. Which in a theatre so intimate as at Bury was probably for the good of all concerned. Tim Luscombe’s direction in the notes to the play probably helped:
Edmund isn’t witty but mustn’t be a “formal ,solemn, lecturer”, either.
He really wasn’t.
Richard Heap as Sir Thomas and Mr. Price was marvellous ( it’s almost like the Captain Hook/Mr Darling role reversal in “Peter Pan” isn’t it?) managing to successfully convey to us some of Sir Thomas’ wry humour, which is present in the novel but hardly ever portrayed in film or on stage in my experience.
The set was simple but clever: Town, Portsmouth and Mansfield were depicted on gauzes printed with Regency engravings behind a simple Repton-esque arcade:
The clatter of the Portsmouth scene, compared to the elegance and calm of Mansfield was very cleverly done, most of the cast suddenly appearing as the unruly Price brood, cavorting around the stage.
This is a long novel, and trying to cram all its content into a production lasting only two and a half hours seems an impossible task. But last night the cast and crew at Bury St Edmunds succeeded in portraying the majority of the action, and moreover, retaining many important moments which I did think might be omitted. The themes of the abolition, the slave trade, education of women, the politics of landscaping etc were only alluded to: the interaction between the lovers and the consequences of their misplaced affections was the main business of the evening. But I’m not complaining, for to manage to portray the main themes of the novels in an economical but exciting a manner was a triumph.
The director, Colin Blumenau is also an admirer of Jane Austen and his past championing of the lost 18th century theatrical repertoire makes him the perfect director of this intimate production, in a theatre with which he is wholly familiar: he was the Artistic Directory at the Bury theatre for 15 years. His knowledge of the theatre of the era was evident in small but telling details: for example, Maria’s gestures when acting out a scene in Lovers Vows were taken directly from Henry Siddons’ Rhetorical Gestures and Actions or so it seemed to me. These tiny references to 18th century life and its theatre were delicious bonuses for a knowledgeable audience but didn’t detract for one minute from the fast pace of the tale. As Mr. Blumenau writes in the plays’ programme:
How fabulous once again, to find myself in the hands of an incomparable writer whose command of our English language makes it a joy to work with- to speak and to hear. The fact that her major works are in novel form only gives rise to regret that she didn’t persevere with her attempts at dramatic writing…and once again how gratifying to know that you are working with the work of a woman. Disenfranchisement and disempowerment did nothing to stifle her voice in the literature of the period. Once again following a long tradition of great women writers the like of Wollstonecraft, Inchbald Cowley and Centlivre, we find a unique female voice is out-writing so many men. I like that a lot.
So do I. And if you want to see this really inspired production, clearly created with much love, affection and, above all, intelligence, then you have your chance. It is still playing at Bury ( a prefect venue given its size and age) till the end of this week, and then it goes on tour, dates and locations here. I would urge you to go. You will not, I think, regret it.



































































24 comments
September 23, 2012 at 2:33 pm
Karen 2L
“urge to slap him”…..Wasn’t SUTH created just for Edmund? I must say the physical casting is perfect. I would have been able to pick out Henry, Mary and Edmund without your captions. Sounds wonderful, Julie. Thanks for posting.
September 23, 2012 at 4:27 pm
jfwakefield
The casting was really fabulous. I’m off to see “Lover’s Vows” tomorrow performed by the same cast( playing the roles they would have performed had the private theatricals not been prematurely ended! I cant wait….
September 24, 2012 at 12:46 pm
imogen88
Wow!
October 3, 2012 at 9:58 am
jfwakefield
LOL!
September 23, 2012 at 3:37 pm
datadea
Sounds like it was a great evening, and I agree with karen on the casting. I looked at the schedule – oddly enough, there are no performances scheduled near my neck of the woods:)
September 23, 2012 at 4:29 pm
jfwakefield
Im so sorry about that ;) I hope it will cross the atlantic, one day ;) The text of the adaptation is being published soon, and perhaps reading that might make up for the lack of a US tour.I’ll let you now as soon as it goes public.
September 23, 2012 at 6:18 pm
Jen K
If only his rents were equal to his rants, perhaps the Hon. Mr. Yates might’ve been able to stay…sounds amazing. I hope you get them a sell out crowd!
September 23, 2012 at 6:21 pm
jfwakefield
Ha! How true….ONe of my favourite lines in the novel, Edmund’s pronouncement re Mr Rushworth (If this man had not twelve thousand a year, he would be a very stupid fellow.) was delivered with some relish last night .Can you tell I really loved this Edmund?
September 24, 2012 at 4:18 pm
Jen K
Whenever the lottery prize reaches ~300 million dollars, everyone discusses what they would do with the money. This last time, my first answer was, “well, we need a proper film adaptation of Mansfield Park!” I wonder if it’s possible. If I win, do you want to co-produce?
I think both Fanny and Edmund are the loveliest characters, especially considering their upbringing. It highlights JA’s use of the honorific “good-natured”.
October 1, 2012 at 1:51 pm
jfwakefield
Deal!
I keep changing my mind about the characters in this novel.But I agree, Jen, I think Edmund and Fannny are some of Jane Austen’s most moral characters. This adaptation certainly highlighted this aspect, while still portraying their faults.
September 23, 2012 at 6:30 pm
cathyallen
Mr Luscombe has good form regarding Jane Austen. I think your statement covers it, for me. I can’t even imagine trying to adapt such a complex novel as Mansfield Park to the stage, but from what you’ve told us, he certainly has done it: Bravo Mr. Luscombe!
I love the theater, and wish I could see it. Thank you for your review, and I’d be interested in the text. Thank you in advance, when you let us know about that!
September 23, 2012 at 6:35 pm
jfwakefield
Yes, even the mere “romance” is complicated and Fanny’s internal monologues, though perfect for the medium of opera, as I wrote last year, are difficult to convey to an audience without the dreaded “voice-over” technique. It was excellently done, and I will be sure to let you know when the text becomes available :) Thanks, Cathy.
September 23, 2012 at 8:24 pm
kwillowKate
How about Mrs. Norris? Never mind slapping- I wanted to reach into the book and choke The Woman! She is the Mrs. Ferrars of Mansfield Park.
September 23, 2012 at 8:31 pm
jfwakefield
If we are talking about the book, then yes, I would agree. Mrs Norris is, in my very humble opinion, Jane Austen’s most vicious female character. This Mrs Norris was quite the bully, a fawning, sponging woman. But no one has ever portrayed her with sufficient malice for my own satisfaction: no one I have seen , on stage or screen, has managed to portray how truly awful she is, and the vision I have of her is genuinely frightening. I did like Edmunds attitude towards her in this adaptation, however, which reflected the situation in the novel perfectly.
September 24, 2012 at 12:49 pm
imogen88
Fabulous theatre, styling, fabulous sets, fabulous cast, costume, story, it’s all there. Thank you for this wonderful review, and the good reasoning behind which certain things were omitted/changed or whatever. I can forgive these things if I know they were done for practical or other well thought out reasons! What a treat, you must have loved it, the commitment of everyone involved shines through this post. And to be treated with a same cast Lovers’ Vows is icing on the cake! Enjoy and report if you will!!
October 1, 2012 at 1:53 pm
jfwakefield
It was a very big treat, Moni.I’m so glad you enjoyed my description, I do wish you had the opportunity to see it!
October 1, 2012 at 2:49 pm
imogen88
YES!!
September 25, 2012 at 9:03 pm
fictional100
What an excellent report–it sounds and looks wonderful! Kristin Atherton, playing Mary Crawford, reminds me a great deal of Melissa Gilbert portraying Laura Ingalls Wilder. And I loved your reference to the dual roles in Peter Pan :). Thanks for your review and the terrific photos!
October 1, 2012 at 1:49 pm
jfwakefield
Thanks Lucy. It was an excellent version of the novel,which I should think is highly problematical to adapt for the stage if the screen adaptations are anything by which to judge!
September 30, 2012 at 11:55 pm
Hazel Mills
I too had the privilege of seeing this performance. I have always loved the intimacy of this theatre and this production was truly exceptional. I’ve read MP several times but this condensed version reminded me how amusing Jane Austen was in Mansfield Park. Worth seeing if it comes near you. thanks for the wonderful review, you capture it immaculately.
October 1, 2012 at 1:48 pm
jfwakefield
Thank you, Hazel.We are both very lucky indeed to see this production in such an appropriate setting. I agree, sometimes the humour of MP gets lost in adaptations: this one seemed to cover “most of the bases”. Did you go to see Lover’s Vows?
October 1, 2012 at 10:29 pm
Hazel Mills
Sadly not. I only learned of the production at Bury too late for the Lover’s Vows. I would love to have seen it as I have an 1808 copy of the play and an original coloured print of Mrs Mardyn who played Amelia (I think at Covent Garden) and was reputed to be the woman who caused the break up of Lord Byron’s marriage. (She was thought to be innocent but the damage was done.) I imagine it was very good. My husband and I still keep saying ” and that bit when…” about the production.
October 2, 2012 at 8:25 am
jfwakefield
Ah,I am sorry you could not attend,as it was such a very interesting evening, and so well done(as ever). Actually the actress who first portrayed “Amelia” in Lover’s Vows at Covent Garden, where it was first performed, was Nannette Johnston(Mrs Henry Erskine Johnson née Parker.) Her husband played Anhalt, which is an interesting casting note in itself!
October 1, 2012 at 1:46 pm
Jane Austen and Lover’s Vows « Austenonly
[...] of the same cast which is currently appearing in the touring production of Mansfield Park, which I reviewed, here. As a result we saw Edmund play Anhalt, Mary Crawford play Amelia, Maria Bertram play Agatha, Fanny [...]