
The disputed portrait, which may be of Jane Austen, now owned by Paula Byrne, on show at the Jane Austen House Museum
This link to the Harper Collins site gives us the publication date for Paula Byrne’s new biography of Jane Austen. The hardback edition of The Real Jane Austen: A Life in Small Things is to be published in Australia on the 2nd January, 2013, and in the UK on the 3rd January 2013. It will cost £25. An E-Text edition( for all formats presumably) will be on sale on the same dates. There does not appear to be a US publication date as yet, but when it is known I will of course pass it on.
The publisher’s website gives us some idea as to the approach the book will be taking:
In this astonishing biography Paula Bryce, the renowned Austen scholar, thwarts all attempts to tame Jane’s reputation into one of dreary respectability and we meet the more likely personality behind such novels as Pride and Prejudice and Persuasion. Through her life and work, Jane emerges as deeply immersed in culture and politics, far ahead of her time in both her writerly ambition and desire for independence.
With new revelations, including Byrne’s discovery of a previously unknown contemporary portrait and the identity of Jane’s long-lost seaside love, this is a depiction of Austen that finally makes sense – an intelligent, subversive and thoroughly modern woman.
The webpage for the Downloadable Audio Book , which is released on the 3rd January, has this to add:
After this book, no longer can Austen be viewed as someone who did not engage with the great political events of her time. How many lovers of her work are aware that the Prince Regent kept a debauched household down the road from her village, that she was related by marriage to other major literary figures of the time such as the libertine Gothic novelist William Beckford and her favourite poet George Crabbe. The book will also identify her long lost seaside love as well as argue that her assumed ‘genteel’ sense of humour could also be savage, highly subversive irony.
I must admit , I am warily looking forward to reading this book. I have, as many of you already know, been researching Jane Austen and Politics for over ten years now, and I am really interested to have the opportunity to compare my notes and discoveries Dr.Byrne’s. As for the portrait, sadly, I still think it lacks the necessary provenance: perhaps this may change when we can finally read the contents of the book.






























































12 comments
September 12, 2012 at 10:06 am
janeaustensequels
I’m looking forward to it too-it will be interesting to see how Paula Byrne ‘sees’ Jane! I love a new biography.
September 12, 2012 at 10:32 am
jfwakefield
Yes,it will be interesting, I agree, Jane.
September 12, 2012 at 11:10 am
Tina
Must remember to put it in my “wish list”, although as a Jane Auste lover, but not a Jane Austen scholar, I’m afraid I won’t have enough background knowledge to fully appreciate it. What I’m really looking forward to is your review of it!!! There is nothing more interesting and educational than the discussion between two knowledgeable points of view. Ahh, you see, I’m no scholar, but so throughly enjoying profiting from your labours!!!!
September 12, 2012 at 11:11 pm
cathyallen
Hear, hear! Couldn’t have said it better myself, so I won’t try! :-)
Thanks, Tina, and Julie.
September 13, 2012 at 1:29 pm
jfwakefield
Thanks Cathy!
September 13, 2012 at 1:31 pm
jfwakefield
Oh, no pressure then ;)Its coming out at a slightly inconvenient time- but Ill give it some thought and then will let you have my thoughts ;)
September 13, 2012 at 12:11 pm
Nancy
The portrait shows a woman of wealth, so on that grounds alone I would be hesitant to claim it as Jane Austen. I also think that most people have ceased looking at JA as sweet Aunt Jane who happed to write a few novels. Her irony and satire isn’t always seen and accepted, but most who think of her as a person see more than a Victorian spinster. ( I know she died before Victoria was even born, but past portraits have presented JA more as a Victorian aunt than a sharp minded , sharp tongue female).However, that doesn’t mean that I accept that JA was a woman of the 21st century who just happened to be born in the 18th century.
Like the others, I am willing to take advantage of your research and scholarship. I have mainly been disappointed in the biographies I have read recently.Everyone seems to have an axe to grind or an agenda. I am almost willing to stick to a Wikipedia entry about a life. Just the facts ma’am.
September 13, 2012 at 1:25 pm
jfwakefield
I really agree with you, Nancy. One reason I am looking forward to reading Maggie Lane’s latest book is that she would be appearing to address this rebalance and force people to think more in 18th than 21st century terms about JA and her works(its on my To Be Read Pile, and as its not on Kindle I find I have less opportunity to read it, as I no longer carry heavy books around with my in consideration of my poor neck- not nerves!)
September 13, 2012 at 1:25 pm
imogen88
Yes, always keen to hear your views on these things, and will wait and see what discussion happens to appear! It’s all happening!
September 13, 2012 at 1:32 pm
jfwakefield
And its going to get busier, with all the P+P200 celebrations! Watch this space1
September 13, 2012 at 5:13 pm
ladyj1800
I agree with everyone else and will look forward to reading what you think! Can’t wait for the P+P celebrations :)
September 13, 2012 at 5:16 pm
jfwakefield
Its going to be a fun year,I hope.Lots of interesting(well, interesting to me, at least!)posts planned.