Today is the anniversary of Jane Austen’s death. She died on the 18th July 1817 in a rented house, Number 8 College Street, Winchester, where she had gone from Chawton in order to seek better medical attention.
Mr Curtis, the apothecary in Alton, the small town near to Chawton, who had treated Jane Austen, had admitted he no longer knew how to deal with her illness. She therefore moved to Winchester on 24th May, and there she was attended by Mr Giles King Lyford. He was the Surgeon-in-Ordinary at the Country Hospital in the city. At first his ministrations seemed to be effecting a little improvement in her condition. She wrote to her nephew, James Edward Austen on the 27th May,1817:
Mr Lydford says he will cure me & if he fails I shall draw up a Memorial & lay it before the Dean and Chapter & have no doubt of redress from that Pious, Learned & Disinterested Body.
Sadly, Mr Lydford did not cure her, and this plaque marks the spot where she died:
She was -as she almost foresaw in her ironic remark to James Edward- buried in Winchester Cathedral: College Street was(and still is) just outside the walls of the Cathedral close.
She was buried in the North Aisle. But there are not one, but three memorials to her in this part of the cathedral, an extraordinary situation, and it is interesting to discover how and why these memorials proliferated.
For years this sombre gravestone, below, was the only memorial to her, and it failed, quite spectacularly, to mention her genius or her works:
The words on the gravestone were composed by Jane Austen’s brother, Henry Austen. No one knows why he failed to mention her genius here, for he certainly mentioned it in the obituary notice of her which he is thought to have written and which appeared in the Salisbury and Winchester Journal of the 28th July 1817:
On Friday the 18th inst., died in this city, Miss Jane Austen, youngest daughter of the late Rev.George Austen, Rector of Steventon, in this county, and the Authoress of Emma, Mansfield Park, Pride and Prejudice and Sensibility. Her manners were most gentle, her affections ardent, her candour was not to be suppressed, and she lived and died as became a humble Christian.
Eventually a second memorial was erected in the cathedral to her memory. The profits from James Edward Austen-Leigh’s memoir of his aunt, published in 1870, paid for a brass memorial tablet to be created and installed near to Jane Austen’s Grave in the north aisle:
The brass plate was designed by James Wyatt,and finally made a small mention of her writings. But this was still not enough, it seems, to fittingly commemorate her. In 1898 a request for donations by way of public subscription, with an individual limit of 5 guineas, was made in a letter to The Times, and it was signed by the Earl of Selborne, Lord Northbrook, W.W B Beach and Montague G. Knight of Chawton, in order that a memorial window could be erected in Jane Austen’s memory in addition to the two existing memorials. This window was designed by Charles Eager Kempe, and was installed in the north wall directly above Jane Austen’s memorial tablet:
The imagery in the window is astounding, and I should imagine, for many visitors to the Cathedral, difficult to interpret today. At the head of the window is a figure of St. Augustine, whose name in its abbreviated form is St Austin. It is therefore a visual pun on Jane Austen’s surname. The central figure in the top row of the window is King David playing his harp. Directly under him is St John, who displays his Gospel, opened at the first words: “In the beginning was the Word…” A latin inscription to Jane Austen is also included, and this can be translated as follows:
Remember in the Lord Jane Austen who died July 18th A.D. 1817.
The figures in the four remaining lights are the sons of Korah who each carry a scroll upon which are inscribed sentences in Latin which allude to the religious nature of Jane Austen’s character. How interesting that even in this window the references to her genius are oblique by today’s standards. And I do often wonder how many visitors to her grave notice the window, for there is only a small notice to the side of the brass tablet which explains it significance. How fascinating to see how, as her fame rose, the memorials to her got greater in size, but were not necessarily plain acknowledgments of her genius.
I suppose, however, that her true memorials are her works, and her words, for which I give daily thanks.





































































15 comments
July 18, 2012 at 6:05 pm
cathyallen
Three memorials, all acknowledging her piety, none acknowledging her genius; it’s quite curious. I didn’t know about the Brass or the Stained Glass ones, so I’m happy to see them. Her words are … words fail me; happily they didn’t fail her!
It’s all very thought-provoking on this anniversary. Thank you.
July 18, 2012 at 10:00 pm
jfwakefield
Well the second memorial, the brass tablet, does mention her writings to be fair:)
“Known to many by her writings,
endeared to her family
by the varied charms of her characters
and ennobled by her Christian faith and piety
was born at Steventon in the County of Hants.”
But unless you knew what those writings were, you would be lost. To have three memorials in one cathedral is one thing, but that they skirt the issue so mich is….almost unbelievable, and says more about the times in which they were erected than anything else, don’t you think.
July 18, 2012 at 10:49 pm
cathyallen
Oh yes! They are very Victorian in nature, aren’t they. I think that was my first surprise when I started studying her about 8 years ago — Jane Austen was definitely NOT a Victorian! She might be entertained by irony.
:-)
July 19, 2012 at 9:16 am
jfwakefield
I often do wonder what she thinks of it all- the memorials,the fame, the sometimes crazed adulation.
July 19, 2012 at 2:09 am
Caitlin
I did not know about the 2 additional memorials either – thank you. Was it her achievement as an author that got her interred in the cathedral as opposed to the graveyard?
July 19, 2012 at 9:15 am
jfwakefield
No, being an author of novels was at the time rather “not quite the thing” so her fame would not have helped her. Permission was probably granted for her to be buried in the cathedral due to her being a member of an ecclesiastical family, with Henry playing the major part, and also because of the support of friends of Jane’s who lived in the cathedral close, notably her old friend Elizabeth Bigg, who was by this time Mrs Heathcote. She was a life long friend of Jane and her sister Cassandra and almost became Jane’s sister-in-law when her brother proposed marriage to Jane( she accepted but, next morning, refused him, remember)
July 19, 2012 at 5:24 am
kfield2
I was there 3 years ago and saw her marker on the floor and had the brass memorial pointed out to me. But I can’t remember if the windows were also pointed out. I didn’t take a picture of them so I’m thinking that they weren’t.
I’ve got a thought on the lack of mention of her writings on her memorials: I’m thinking that grave markers back then didn’t mention the professions of the people buried under them, but of their Christian lives, particularly Jane’s, as the daughter of a rector. I think they understood what so many have forgotten or choose not to believe anymore: this life is not the end, especially as a Christian. The greatest part of a Christian’s life is to go to be with the Lord so death, while it can be painful to the person if it isn’t a sudden thing, is to be looked forward to for relief from this present suffering. Her faith would have taught her that this life is short and the best was yet to come. In light of that, I think they may have felt it was ungodly to focus on what a person did in this life rather than who they were inside, especially for a woman. I have never read anything on this, though I’ve read 2 books on Jane Austen and the Church and Clergy. I’m just basing this on my personal experience as a Christian and trying to put that into the context of Jane Austen’s life. I’ve been living with chronic illnesses for over 17 years now and I can easily see that as she declined in health her hope was in what was yet to come. I’m not pointing out that she didn’t have any regrets about dying so young or that there were things she still wanted to do in life, but about accepting circumstances you can’t change with the hope she proclaimed to have in God. Secular societies today can’t relate to that kind of “national”, common faith that the mass majority of people then SAID was their belief system.
Response?
July 19, 2012 at 9:09 am
jfwakefield
Very probably, Henry’s inscription is entirely conventional for the time. But…Henry took an age to say very little -it is 122 words long-and what he did say was as nearly as much about her family as opposed to being solely about her ;) And it is interesting to compare the wording of the stone with the obituary notices. There were 11 and looking at Gibson’s Bibliography, – seven of them include the fact that she was an author,and it is thought that Henry composed the most comprehensive of these, published in the “Salisbury and Winchester Journal”. In my opinion, for what it is worth, the gravestone is a product of its age and Henry Austen’s new found vocation as a clergyman: he had only recently been ordained in the Church of England by the Bishop of Winchester in December 1816.
Its very interesting to me that you note that on your visit to the cathedral the Memorial Window was not pointed out to you, but the grave and the tablet were.
July 19, 2012 at 3:35 pm
hablandodejanedejane
What a fascinating entry! I agree, too, with the fact that mentioning the works of Jane at that time would not have been the most appropriate. A woman was, as Jane herself wrote, admired by her beauty or her disposition, but not by her genius. So the best they could write about her was the goodness of her heart and character.
The way we see it now is that it wasn’t fair but, definitely, was more realistic. And Jane was extremely aware of what was going on at that time.
Her brave steps were so subtle that many people are even nowadays unable to identify them correctly.
July 19, 2012 at 3:39 pm
jfwakefield
I think-and its difficult to express exactly why I mean(!)- its all part of her elusiveness. She’s like a bead of mercury rolling around a piece of glass. Difficult to grasp. We don’t know what she really looked like, often her statements in her letters can be read many ways..we think we know her, (intimately) but do we? And this elusiveness is echoed in her memorials, in a way.
July 19, 2012 at 4:09 pm
hablandodejane
Well, I think what you say is very “exact”. In fact, not only with her life, but with her novels, the lack of physical descriptions allow the readers to create and recreate her stories… and somehow, her life too. That’s her trick… and what a trick! A genius’, definitely.
July 19, 2012 at 4:19 pm
jfwakefield
Oh goodness, yes. And the more you study her works, the more her genius reveals itself, but she, somehow, seems to recede into the ether….;)
July 20, 2012 at 10:20 am
hablandodejane
No problem at all!! Here we are to look for her wherever she may be…
July 25, 2012 at 9:30 am
Five things to do in West Sussex & Hampshire | magellanstraits
[...] Jane Austen’s Memorials in Winchester Cathedral (austenonly.com) Share this:PrintEmailFacebookTwitterStumbleUponLinkedInLike this:LikeBe the first to like this. [...]
July 25, 2012 at 2:43 pm
imogen88
Very good post, I didn’t know of the windows either. The “bead of mercury” is very apt about JA Julie, yet in spite of that you give us much to go on, and this post is a fitting tribute, allowing us to learn more. Thank you!