You may recall a scene in Patricia Rozeman’s adaptation of Mansfield Park where we see Julia and Maira Bertram playing a strange instrument for the entertainment of the family . Here is a scene cap from the film showing them at work:
They were, in fact, playing a glass harmonica.
This is a fascinating instrument which was invented by the American polymath, Benjamin Frankin in 1761 while he was living in London. He had heard Edward Delaval , a Fellow of the Royal Society, play on his set of musical glasses in 1759. This was an idea with which we are more familiar, I think , as we can still see these types of glasses played today by some variety artists. In fact these glasses -wine glasses filled to different levels with water which were played by rubbing wetted fingers along the rims- seems to have been the brain child of a Mr Puckeridge of Ireland, but he and his glasses perished in a fire. Edward Delaval was fascinated by the properties of glass and he studied the specific gravities of several metals and their colors when bonded with glass, and also how to use it in the manufacture of artificial gems, hence his interest in this instrument. Benjamin Franklin improved upon his idea- of the rows of glasses fitted in a cabinet, by creating a very different instrument. Here is his design from the modern exponent, Thomas Bloch’s fascinating website:
You can see that it is quite radically different: scores of glass bowls are nested within each other, strung centrally on a spindle that spins, and which is turned by means of a treadle. Here, below, is a late 18th century version in its wooden cabinet, with a handle to turn the glass bowls, not a treadle:
Here is a photograph of Thomas Bloch’s own glass harmonica, which shows the position of the players hands when operating the harmonica :
Frnaklin’s instrument was so improved that it transformed the performance aspects of the harmonica. Now duets could be played,as in the adaptation of Mansfield Park, and individual players could now play chords .If you go here you can see the example in London Horniman Musuem which was used in the linked BBC Radio 3 programme below.
This was not an instrument that could be enjoyed by everyone: it was very expensive to produce and buy and needed very specifically trained teachers. Mozart was a fan and wrote some beautiful music for it. It was used by Mesmer as part of his electronic experiments, to soothe his patients. But this reputation for celestial soothing music was not long lived. One of its most famous exponents was the blind German-born woman, Marianne Kirchgessner, and she was famous for giving concerts on the instrument throughout Europe. She was rumoured to have been driven mad by playing the instrument, but this was probably not due to its strange sound( which I confess I can only listen to for very small intervals as it makes me grind my teeth!) but to lead poisoning. Playing with whetted fingers on glass that had high lead content most probably contributed to her demise.
Modern composers have use the instrument to great effect- in film scores and in rock music; Pink Floyd’s Dark Side of the Moon, for example. If you would like to know more of the history of this fascinating instrument you might care to listen to this fabulous BBC Radio 3 programme, presented by Dame Eveyln Glennie, one of our most distinguished percussion players, shown below.
If Chimes Could Whisper is a short (45 minutes long) but totally enthralling history of the Glass Harmonica and contains a lot of examples of the instrument being played- pieces of music which date from the 18th century to the present day.
If you click on the link above you should be able to access the webpage linking got the programme which is available to “listen again” for another five days.
Alternatively here, above, is a video of Thomas Bloch playing his fabulous glass harmonica, which I’m sure you will enjoy. It is a very evocative sound. How appropriate that the Miss Bertrams were portrayed playing such an instrument; expensive, exclusive, seemingly celestial but with hidden dangers ;)



































































19 comments
April 30, 2012 at 1:59 pm
janeaustensequels
I love the sound-and thought it was used to great effect in Mansfield Park!
May 1, 2012 at 1:44 pm
jfwakefield
I can only stand it for a small amount of time- less than a minute, before I run screaming from the room! Good job we are all different , Jane ;)
April 30, 2012 at 2:24 pm
Ramya
Wow! So fascinating… so Rozema got something right.. haha
May 1, 2012 at 1:46 pm
jfwakefield
LOL, ….now, now Ramya;) But yes, this was an authentic, expensive instrument so including it in the film was not an anachronism ;)
April 30, 2012 at 4:01 pm
Susan Kaye
Reblogged this on Jane Started It! and commented:
I didn’t see the version of Mansfield Park mentioned in this story, but the instrument is fascination.
May 1, 2012 at 1:47 pm
jfwakefield
Its a fascinating adaptation- for what it gets wrong ,IMHO, as much as for what it gets right. If you can find a cheap DVD, then I’d see it at least once.Though this version’s “Feisty Fanny” is just sooooo wrong ;)
May 1, 2012 at 2:11 pm
Susan Kaye
LOL!! I love “Feisty Fanny.” Maybe a double feature with the “Aerobic Anne” of the 2007 adaption of Persuasion is in order!
May 1, 2012 at 2:16 pm
jfwakefield
Oh not the Bath Marathon! I really detested these ITV versions, even Northanger Abbey wasn’t filmed in Bath!and in the ITV Mansfield Park Fanny was not banished to Portsmouth, which is SO important!
May 1, 2012 at 8:53 pm
Susan Kaye
I suppose we are to suspend disbelief even for the adaptors of the novels as well as writers generally now. I have the ’07 version but was so annoyed at the ham-handed way they dropped all the Mrs Smith story in the middle of the street, I rarely watch it. *sigh*
April 30, 2012 at 9:20 pm
cathyallen
I haven’t seen that version of Mansfield Park, but having read this, perhaps I should. I heard of this instrument some years ago, as someone played one here in San Diego’s Balboa Park Summer Sunday Evening Outdoor Concert at the Organ Pavillion. I think it was accompanied by that “Mighty Wurlitzer,” but I’m not sure ;-) (A unique instrument in itself!)
I had never before seen it spelled with the “H.” It was always Ben Franklin’s Glass Armonica, so that is a surprise to me. I do like the sound, and remember several occasions from my childhood when my Dad would line up the crystal water goblets, as you described, and play “The Bells of St. Mary’s” on them. :-) Because of that, I think my whole family is delighted with the sound. It is distinctive, no question about it; a little does go a long way.
Happy memories. Thank you for sharing this, Julie; I will enjoy the links more later.
May 1, 2012 at 1:49 pm
jfwakefield
I think the “h” is optional ;) The film is very interesting.I don’t agree with a lot of its ideas, especially in relation to the fabric Masnfield Park, but I can see what Patricia Rozema was trying to achieve.I think she chose the wrong targets and making Fanny a feisty version of a young Jane Austen( who may have been fairly feisty herself!) was just wrong.
May 1, 2012 at 11:43 am
Vic
I love the sound and have learned something absolutely new today! I totally overlooked the instrument when watching the film.
May 1, 2012 at 1:51 pm
jfwakefield
Its easily done, Vic, as it doesn’t appear for very long.But it is just the sort of expensive accomplishment that we might expect Mrs Norris to indulge the Miss Bertrams with, don’t you think ;)
May 1, 2012 at 12:38 pm
imogen88
A bit creepy, yes! Interesting also, thanks Julie for this post, as I have heard the variously filled crystal glasses being played and it is quite interesting! We are still waiting for the definitive MP – I wonder who will deliver?
May 1, 2012 at 1:53 pm
jfwakefield
Ah, the definitive MP- I think it is an almost impossible novel to portray adequately on the screen. The opera I saw last year was excellent in illustrating a lot of the points the other versions omitted to mention,but it did gloss over some of the most important aspects, and to portray this as merely a romance is to lose a lot of its biting critique of early 19th century society.
May 1, 2012 at 2:01 pm
imogen88
You are most probably right. The mini series done early in the piece had some good gems from the text, and that’s the only one that did this. Well said.
May 1, 2012 at 2:15 pm
jfwakefield
Yes,but it was a bit pedestrian, (forgive me!) and to be honest I always thought that Mrs Norris was not vicious enough.
May 1, 2012 at 2:39 pm
imogen88
YES
May 1, 2012 at 3:16 pm
Trix Bodde
I alerted a friend to this fascinating article, and she reported that her cat ran out of the room in terror when she played the little clip at the end! So you are not the only one with delicate hearing! Trix B.