As many of you know, recently research, most notably and most diligently undertaken by Janet Clark of the Jane Austen Society, has shown that Worthing in Sussex is most probably Jane Austen’s inspiration for the setting of Sanditon, her last, alas incomplete, work.
Jane Austen stayed in Worthing during the late summer, autumn and possibly winter of 1805, along with her mother, sister, Cassandra and Martha Lloyd, plus her brother, Edward Austen Knight and his wife, Elizabeth, their daughter Fanny, and her governess Anne Sharp. The cottage where she stayed, Stanford Cottage is now a branch of a nation-wide, well- known pizza chain and recently the Worthing Civic Society has erected a plaque there to commemorate Jane Austen’s happy and productive stay in the town.
While she was there Jane Austen seems to have soaked up the atmosphere and the personalities of the locals who were striving to promote a new, bustling watering-place, with an eye to profits . If you go here you can read some more of Janet Clarke’s discoveries,which I find fascinating. I took a trip round Worthing a couple of years ago to see the Austen sites, and while it is no longer the Regency resort of Jane Austen’s day, there are still a few places that she would have known and recognised.
How sad it is to hear, therefore, that one of these places is threatened, and public access to it may permanently cease.
Above is the space under discussion. It is, to use the old Sussex dialect term for it, a Twitten, that is, a small passageway between two walls, examples of which can still be found in some English towns. It is owned by Stagecoach, the nation-wide coaching company, and, as you can see, above, one end of the Twitten is accessed through their property, the local Stagecoach bus station. The other end of the Twitten leads to Library Place, where the circulating library that Jane Austen used in Worthing was situated. It is highly probable that she used this Twitten to visit it, as Stanford Cottage can be accessed via this Twitten and the station, and it is , in fact, a short cut.
This has been the subject of much dispute, and a planning meeting is to be held at the end of March to discuss it.
As Janet Clarke has told me recently, the Twitten
would have been a delightful short cut from her (Jane Austen’s-jfw) residence, in the autumn of 1805, through open land to the seafront and circulating library. It is wonderful for visitors today, to walk in Jane’s footsteps , especially as Stanford Cottage and part of the circulating library are still standing ( the pathway directly links the two as it has done for over 200 years ). Permanently stopping up the pathway would be very detrimental to the Jane Austen trail in Worthing, damaging our heritage and tourism, and diminishing the overall appreciation of Jane Austen’s Worthing for present and future generations.
I really do think that losing any part of our Austen heritage, however small, is just unthinkable. At a time when new discoveries about Jane Austen-related buildings are being made -see the Steventon rectory project- why on earth would a local council want to stop public access to a charming relic of Worthing that Jane Austen would have known and used ? And I would have thought that in these difficult financial times that any direct link to our greatest novelist should be preserved for the public to use and to attract tourism to the town. We are, after all, only five years from the bicentenary of her death in 1817, and interest in all things Jane has never been higher.
I am appalled to be frank, and am considering my response to the council. What do you think about this?

































































12 comments
March 8, 2012 at 3:50 pm
Tina
Julie, I couldn’t agree with you more. I cannot believe they can be so short sighted! What reason could they have? To preserve private property? From whom? Austen loving hooligans? Even if they’re no Austen lovers (we have to admit that there may be some out there) the economic advantage of keeping the passage open is unquestionable. Unbelievable!
March 11, 2012 at 11:46 am
jfwakefield
It does seem very short-sighted, I have to say. Thank you very much for tour support, Tina, and for taking the time to comment.
March 8, 2012 at 7:15 pm
Jayne
I am in full agreement with your thoughts Julie. I wonder what the reaction would be if this were a Charles Dickens site? – he seems to be the author of the moment. Followers of Jane Austen are loyal and determined, they WILL visit Worthing to retrace JA’s footsteps. I support your efforts and with the JAS’s participation let us hope that publicity and pressure come to bear and a good decision is made at the meeting. Start recruiting all JA supporters to circle that day on the calendar and attend the meeting! Let their voices be heard.
March 11, 2012 at 11:51 am
jfwakefield
Yes, I think the tenacity of Janeites is being vastly underestimated here. As we all know, let us have an association with a place,and we will visit! In droves, and we will also spend money. I would have thought that they would be encouraging access not restricting it. Thanks for commenting ;)
March 9, 2012 at 12:17 am
Cathy Allen
I’m apalled, too, Julie. If anyone can help this cause, it’s you! Give it everything you can — which is a GREAT DEAL, in my humble opinion — and I’m confident the council will see the error of their ways. I look forward to hearing of your victory!
P.S. I’ve always thought I’d certainly want you on MY side in court! :-)
March 11, 2012 at 11:52 am
jfwakefield
Well,thank you, but Im glad I can do my bit, which is not much to be frank. But it really is astonishing that a council would consider closing off part of its heritage like this. I am all astonishment, to be frank.
March 9, 2012 at 3:49 am
Janeite Deb
Thanks Julie for posting about this – anyone wanting to support the effort to reconsider this plan to close the twitten [the owners are citing safety issues as the reason] should write a letter to Janet Clarke of the Jane Austen Society in Worthing – I think you Julie or I can take such letters via email and then forward them to Janet… I did a post on this with a sample letter of support and you can read it here:
http://janeausteninvermont.wordpress.com/2012/03/01/the-library-passage-in-worthing-under-threat-of-closure-how-you-can-help/
so please anyone interested in the future of this historic Jane Austen site should send a letter expressing their concerns… and thanks again Julie for writing about this and getting it out there to your followers…..!
Best,
Deb
-
March 11, 2012 at 1:03 pm
jfwakefield
Its a very strange situation- when associations with the worlds greatest novelist are thought not to matter.Can you imagine this happening if this passageway had a link with Shakespeare?
March 9, 2012 at 8:05 pm
Karen
Well said, counsellor! I can’t help but wonder with what the Council plans to replace it — ? A place to store rubbish bins? To what other use could such a narrow space be put? Even if they are dismissive of or disinterested in JA (one can just barely imagine such an attitude!), surely they should not be dismissive or disinterested in maximizing the JA connection for their own town’s aggrandizement. Good luck, and do keep us posted as to what you hear back from the Council.
March 11, 2012 at 11:54 am
jfwakefield
I will. I will be submitting a response to the council, taking into account al your replies posted here and the emails I have received. It is a truly astonishing stance to take, given Jane’s fame worldwide. Most councils/businesses would love to have an association with her to aid their tourist programmes. Seems a very shortsighted attitude to take, I think
March 17, 2012 at 3:41 am
imogen88
Have tweeted this and tweeted Deb’s post also, as ever, it goes without saying this twitten ought to stay open for more than one reason alone. People do want to see these things, and once they are gone, they can never be brought back. Very keen to see the outcome of this one, Julie.
March 21, 2012 at 10:06 am
jfwakefield
Thank you Moni. I agree we do want to see these places,and its madness to think of restricting public access. I’ll report back after the hearing at the end of April ;)