Continuing our series of posts to celebrate the 200th Anniversary of the first publication of Sense and Sensibility, I thought it might be an opportune moment today to write about sentimental jewellery as worn by Edward Ferrars.
Poor Elinor Dashwood. She has all her hopes about a gently burgeoning, mutual and serious attraction between her and Edward Ferrars cruelly dashed, when it is revealed that a ring containing hair, one that he has suddenly taken to wearing, is made from a plaited lock, not of his sisters or even her own hair as Elinor had initially surmised, but of hair belonging to the scheming Lucy Steele to whom he is clandestinely engaged:
Elinor saw that it was his hand, and she could doubt no longer. The picture, she had allowed herself to believe, might have been accidentally obtained; it might not have been Edward’s gift; but a correspondence between them by letter, could subsist only under a positive engagement, could be authorised by nothing else; for a few moments, she was almost overcome — her heart sunk within her, and she could hardly stand; but exertion was indispensably necessary, and she struggled so resolutely against the oppression of her feelings, that her success was speedy, and for the time complete.
”Writing to each other,” said Lucy, returning the letter into her pocket, “is the only comfort we have in such long separations. Yes, I have one other comfort in his picture; but poor Edward has not even that . If he had but my picture, he says he should be easy. I gave him a lock of my hair set in a ring when he was at Longstaple last, and that was some comfort to him, he said, but not equal to a picture. Perhaps you might notice the ring when you saw him?”
”I did;” said Elinor, with a composure of voice under which was concealed an emotion and distress beyond anything she had ever felt before. She was mortified, shocked, confounded.
Sense and Sensibility, Chapter 22.
So, now we find Elinor, surrounded by the many proofs of the existence of the engagement between Lucy and Edward: earlier in this chapter Lucy had already produced a portrait miniature of Edward, a strong proof of an attachment as lovers often wore portraits of their love ( or his or her eyes) set in jewellery ; then she produced a letter, proof, as the passage above indicates, of an engagement as during this period a correspondence between young men and women was only properly to be undertaken between engaged men and women (there were other exceptions to the “no letter writing” rule, that is between relations or correspondence about a matter business); and the coup de grace is the hair ring, a very intimate token of regard. Elinor,and we, the readers, can no longer doubt that Edward and Lucy are indeed engaged and involved intimately, albeit secretly.
Hair jewellery has been out of fashion for some time now. I am lucky to posses a few family pieces in my collection dating from the mid 18th century to the late 19th century. Some people find these items squeamish. I confess, I don’t.
The hair jewellery with which we are most familiar is, I suppose, mourning jewellery, which often contained a lock of hair of the deceased and would have been given to members of the deceased’s family as a memento. And indeed hair did not need to be made into jewellery to be treasured. Jane Austen’s hair was kept as a momento, see below,
as was a lock of her father’s hair, and both are kept in the collection of the Jane Austen’s House Museum. Do note the label -My Father’s Hair- is written in Jane’s hand:
Here are two items of mourning jewellery containing hair from my collection:
a Georgian brooch, above, dating from 1816, containing a lock of hair held in a glass locket surrounded by pearls
and a later Victorian brooch dating from 1852, made of gold with black enamel decoration. The hair is plaited in the centre glass window of the jewel, as Lucy’s hair would have been plaited and set in Edward’s ring.
But, as we have now realised, some of these sentimental jewels were given as tokens of love and fidelity, often at the time of an engagement. They did not always denote memorials of death.
This, above is another family piece, circa 1765, and it is obvious from the colour of the gemstone used, -pink foiled tourmaline- that the brooch is not meant to symbolise memories of death. Mourning jewellery most often used two colours- white and black -as these were permitted colours associated with the first and most severe period of mourning. It is interesting to note that white emanel used on a piece would often indicate that the deceased was unmarried at death.
The reverse of the brooch has a small compartment filled with lightly plaited hair , presumably taken from the beloved’s head. It is, of course not ,seen by anyone when the piece is being worn,as it is hidden next to the skin or clothes. I often wonder of this brooch commemorated a clandestine relationship ….I do wish it could talk.
The fashion for purely sentimental, or lover’s jewellery increased after the publication in 1761 of Rousseaus’ La Nouvelle Heloise as Diana Scarisbrick explains in her magnificent book, Jewellery in Britain 1066-1837: a Documentary, Society, Literary and Artistic Survey:
Devotees of this novel extolling the virtues of the simple life and true love paraded their enamel crystal lockets of hair and the miniatures of loved one as proudly as they wore parues of rubies or diamonds. Mrs Delaney expressed the feelings which such jewels represented in her lines
All things but friendship such as your
Inconstant pass away
This lock the emblem of your love
Like that will ne’er decay.
Mrs Delaney’s poem alludes to the reason why hair was chosen as a memorial of love: hair simply does not rot away…as everlasting regard or love should endure…
Both types of hair jewellery have been in the news this year, for in January a love token, not a memorial piece, containing hair supposed to be that of Lord Nelson and Emma Hamilton, was sold in Salisbury by the auctioneer Wooley and Wallis of Salisbury.
It was a double sided locket. One side, above, allegedly showing a lock of Lord Nelson’s hair, together with an anchor worked in seed pearls and the initial ”N” …
and the reverse of the locket , showing what is thought to have been Emma Hamilton’s auburn hair. When it sold the piece achieved the amazing figure of £44,000.
Last week a piece of mourning jewellery commemorating Napoleon was sold by the auctioneer David Lay of Penzance in Cornwall, for the rather more modest price of £4000
So, there you are, a little explanation of hair jewellery as worn by Edward Ferrars, which was, when Sense and Sensibility was composed and written, an up to the minute expression of regard, and denoted the true nature of his relationship with Lucy Steele. No wonder poor Elinor was depressed when confronted with the evidence of this ring and what it represented.







































































25 comments
May 10, 2011 at 1:37 pm
Katherine Louise
Thank you for this very interesting post. I especially liked the pink tourmaline–I can imagine Marianne wearing such a thing, with a lock of Willoughby’s hair concealed against her breast.
May 10, 2011 at 4:07 pm
jfwakefield
Poor Marianne, to be involved with such a rotter!
May 10, 2011 at 1:58 pm
Raquel
Julie,
absolutely gorgeous your post about hair jewellery! May use only one image to send my readers to your post?
thank you, raquel
May 10, 2011 at 4:07 pm
jfwakefield
Thank you, Raquel, and of course you can use any of the photographs you wish!
May 10, 2011 at 5:03 pm
Anna
How very interesting, Julie! I was wondering how hair jewellery would look, as I was reading Sense And Sensibility. Have a better idea now. It does indeed seem like a very strange fashion from the modern point of view!
May 11, 2011 at 8:31 am
jfwakefield
My pleasure,Anna. I suppose it does seem a little strange, but I really like this type of hair jewellery. I’m not so keen on the type of jewellery made of woven hair however. That does make me feel uncomfortable. But a lock of hair contained in a compartment in a ring or locket, that’s fine ;)
May 10, 2011 at 5:15 pm
Shannon Winslow
Fascinating post, and the pictures fabulous. Thanks for enlightening me about this beautiful, but slightly creepy, custom.
May 11, 2011 at 8:33 am
jfwakefield
Hello Shannon and thanks for stopping by to comment. I’m glad you enjoyed the post,even though it slightly creeped you out!
May 10, 2011 at 6:52 pm
O anel de Edward Ferrars | Jane Austen em Português
[...] inglês vale a pena pelas imagens que podem ser ampliadas para vermos os mínimos detalhes: “Edward Ferrars, Napoleon and Nelson’s Hair Jewellery as Memorials and Love Tokens”. This entry was posted in Artesanato, Artigos & Resenhas, Livros, Moda, Razão e sentimento, [...]
May 10, 2011 at 9:59 pm
Cathy Allen
Most interesting, as always, Julie. I, too, wonder if the hidden hair in the tourmaline brooch symbolizes a clandestine love. I happen to be wearing my (tiny!) pink tourmaline ring today, and as tourmalines are one of the few gems actually mined in San Diego, I wonder if the stones are from here… If only they, and the brooch, and the other mementoes could talk, as you said; what stories would they tell? Thank you!
May 11, 2011 at 8:37 am
jfwakefield
I think the stones most probably originated from Shri Lanka, as they were imported from there to Europe by the Dutch East India Company in the 18th century. Wherever they were from its rather a romantic jewell, don’t you think?I’m glad you enjoyed the post Cathy!
May 10, 2011 at 11:48 pm
Caitlin
Another brooch theory – is it possible it was a gift, and when the giver died, a hair compartment was added? As much as I love the idea of a clandestine forbidden love, it saddens me, unless you have a family story of two lovers who were eventually reunited. Or maybe, separated by war, then a happy ending…or, for the birth of a child whose birth stone is pink tourmaline, and its the child’s hair…so many possibilities….
May 11, 2011 at 8:38 am
jfwakefield
So many possibilities indeed.Caitlin, you have missed your calling and you ought to be a novelist!
May 11, 2011 at 4:05 pm
ragdoll1951
Thank You Julie, I’ve never viewed such an array and variety of hair jewlery before! And I find her father’s hair expecially sweet, and wonder about why it was not placed in some wearable piece -pehaps Mrs. Austen did not wear any jewlery.
Christy
May 12, 2011 at 11:28 am
jfwakefield
Or perhaps it was too expensive to have either lock of hair mounted in a piece of jewellery?
May 12, 2011 at 3:53 pm
ragdoll1951
Yes, of course. Mrs. Austen’s was very practical. And I love the image of her using her some of her original red wedding ‘riding-habit’ as later material for a riding outfit for young Frank -so “Fly” could ride his pony, “Squirrel” in bright style!~~~:-)
Christy
May 12, 2011 at 6:23 pm
jfwakefield
Ah, Mrs Austen, she and I have a love hate /relationship!
May 13, 2011 at 2:32 am
Karen Field
I totally get that. She raised “our Jane” but she seemed focused on her rights as a mother. I hope I’m never that kind of mother.
May 11, 2011 at 8:28 pm
Sheila
Thanks for this Julie. How lucky you are to have heirlooms. I’ve seen (and read about) hair mementoes – and like you, find the idea of, say, a plaited hair bracelet, to be a bit weird. Brooches or rings don’t bother me though
May 12, 2011 at 11:30 am
jfwakefield
Hello, Sheila! I count myself very lucky to have these items, and treasure them. I agree, those woven pieces…*shudder*
May 12, 2011 at 12:14 pm
Gone Today, Hair Tomorrow « austenonly
[...] is the title of this BBC Radio 4 programme,available to Listen Again here, which was kindly bought to my attention by one of my correspondents after reading my Edward Ferrars and Hair Jewellery post. [...]
May 12, 2011 at 12:42 pm
imogen88
Love this area of jewellery and also the “fine eyes” pieces and all the info about them, per Pride and Prejudice. What could be more special than remembering someone with something so grace filled? I do not find this art morbid at all, but full of life, as you point out. Anyway, such beauty was so interesting to read more about and I loved seeing Jane Austen’s hair and her father’s. Good reading, Julie.
May 12, 2011 at 6:25 pm
jfwakefield
I’m glad someone feels the way I do;) it commemorates everlasting love, so I don’t find it morbid;)
May 14, 2011 at 11:56 am
imogen88
It is the crowning glory after all. Good, Julie.
May 13, 2011 at 2:37 am
Karen Field
I think the memorial jewelry with hair is an idea that takes getting used to. I saw Jane’s locks, as well as her father’s, at Jane Austen’s House Museum and viewed them with the interest of a Janeite but none of the history. Thank you for providing this post and the information.