This is the third and final of our posts on Kirby Hall in Northamptonshire, which was used as the setting for Mansfield Park in Patricia Rozema’s 1999 adaptation of Jane Austen’s novel. Today we shall concentrate on the exteriors and the garden.
This is the magnificent main range of the house, on the south side of the courtyard.
This is how it appeared in the film. As you can see below, if you look carefull at the windows to the left of the central entrance, you can see that this part of the range is now ruined,but by artful use of glass and temporary glazing, the filmmakers disguised the wrecked nature of that part of the building.
The north side of the inner courtyard, which faces the entrance above, was used as the main entrance to Mansfield in the film.
This north side of the courtyard actually contains a loggia- an arcaded space- on the ground floor,which supported another long gallery on the first floor.
This has all disappeared, and there is no roof or first floor actually remaining…just the ruined loggia beneath…

This shows the view through the entrance to the inner courtyard on to the forecourt…
The formal gardens, the West Gardens, have been extensively restored after years of careful excavations, and this is where ,in the film, Miss Crawford was given her infamous riding lesson.
We see part of this scene from a vantage point through a window on the first floor of the house.
The garden is extremely beautiful, and is a recreation of how it would have appeared in the mid 17th century.
The walk from the house to a formal “Mount”, a viewing point in the garden was also used

by Mary and Henry Crawford, walking along a gravel walk near to the parterre.
and this is a video of the site taken from that viewpoint..complete with strimming gardener sound effects….my apologies…

The magnificent bay windows also feature in the film, and they are as beautiful outside as in, giving the feel ,as Sacheverell Sitwell described them in 1945 as appearing like two galleons at anchor, side by side…
To the right of these windows is the service wing of the house…which is now in ruins…
And this site was used for one of the final scenes in the film, showing the remaining family at home at Mansfield.
And that concludes our tour of the buildings as used by the film. It is a most beautiful setting and I would recommend you to go and see it, as it has a unique atmosphere. And students of architecture would love it as in many places the bones of the building are laid bare…

But before we leave you may be interested to note that there is a genuine Jane Austen connection to Kirby Hall. During the late 18th/early 19th centuries the hall was owned by a neighbour of Edward Austen Knight’s in Kent: George Finch Hatton of Eastwell Park
Jane Austen found his wife to be trying company, as she was not a great conversationalist.
I have discovered that Lady Elizabeth, for a woman of her age and situation, has astonishingly little to say for herself, and that Miss Hatton has not much more. Her eloquence lies in her fingers; they were most fluently harmonious.
Letter to Cassandra Austen dated 24th August 1805.
And I daresay Mrs Finch Hatton had an interesting tale should she have wished to tell it, as she was the granddaughter of Lord Mansfield the judge,and was brought up by Mansfield and his wife in the company of her illegitimate cousin, Dido Elizabeth Belle. Here they are in the famous painting of them, once thought to be by Zoffany:
©The Earl of Mansfield
You can read more of her story here. No wonder Jane Austen was all astonishment at her silence. Convinced as I am that Jane Austen named her novel Mansfield Park as an abolitionist tribute to Lord Mansfield,who had presided in the famous Somerset Case, I wonder if the makers of the film knew of this connection between their choice of film location and Jane Austen’s political views? I do hope this wasn’t all accidental,but suspect it may have been….
















































































16 comments
February 27, 2011 at 5:41 pm
Anna
Fascinating! I’m sure this will have given Jane Austen at least an association when she named Mansfield Park… although she apparently never wrote characters from the people that she knew, she certainly chose names of people that she knew of or had read of (such as Willoughby in Burney’s Evelina).
March 1, 2011 at 9:52 am
jfwakefield
Yes, I think her conversation with her friend in Alton, Mrs Ann Barrett, clearly indicates that while the invention of her characters was entirely the work of her genius, their names were another matter and those that attracted her/ or repelled her were fair game ;)
Im not sure however in this case that the association with Jane Austen and the Finch Hatton family was ever made by the filmmakers.
February 27, 2011 at 11:12 pm
Cathy Allen
Wonderful Julie; only you would make that connection! Thank you for the tours, and for your insights.
CEA
March 1, 2011 at 9:55 am
jfwakefield
Im glad you enjoyed it, and I do hope you take a look at the film, if only for one viewing, as it is very interesting in its way, though disappointing,IMHO.
February 27, 2011 at 11:26 pm
Karen Field
I have enjoyed this series. Thank you for touring this site for us!
March 1, 2011 at 9:56 am
jfwakefield
Im glad you have enjoyed it,Karen.I do hope you get to visit it one day as it is really a fascinating and very romantic site.
February 28, 2011 at 12:05 am
Caitlin
I like that description, 2 galleons at anchor. What an interesting Austen connection. I’ve always enjoyed that painting of Dido- she looks mischevious and a lot of fun.
March 1, 2011 at 9:58 am
jfwakefield
It really is very apt, isn’t it? Yes, Dido does look interesting, but seems ultimately to have had a strange existence at Kenwood with the Mansfields and certainly did not enter high society.
March 3, 2011 at 12:33 pm
imogen88
So very interesting. I would like to know more as many queries popped up when I read this connection. Never mind, adds so much the the meaning of the house, amazing stuff. Wow.
March 3, 2011 at 12:56 pm
jfwakefield
Email me if you want to discuss anything, Moni, you know you can always do that;)
March 4, 2011 at 9:55 am
imogen88
Thank you, Julie, will do.
March 4, 2011 at 4:04 am
BobD
Julie
This tour has been extraordinary. Thank you so much. I am amazed that any house abandoned for 200 years has enough left to restore. So very sad to see the galery and west lodgings no longer exist. Such a magnificent structure–could it really have been entirely abandoned–uninhabited–for 200 years? And what of the Hattons? Why were they forced to abandon it? It could not be rented to some Bingley? You also said it was rebuilt in 1570–was the prior structure similar in any way? So sorry for the questions. Thanks again for a lovely slice of history.
March 4, 2011 at 11:11 am
jfwakefield
Well, yes…there were occasional visits after the furniture was sold after George Finch Hatton’s death, in1824, but it has gradually gone into a gentle decline. Sir John Summerson the great architectural historian wrote of it thus:
The beauty of Kirkby’s decline is that it was private and without violence. The house was never burnt, ravaged, used as a quarry or assaulted by mobs. It simply lapsed…today the memory is still unsullied, sharp and clear so that if roofs, windows and doors suddenly reassembled themselves, the stones would take it as an unsurprising compliment.
By 1836 only a labourer was living in the library! In 1894 a large charity picnic was held in the grounds for 2,00 children, but that was the last great event held there by the owners. In the mid 19th century there was a terrible decline in estates/farmland values due to inflation etc,and so a Bingley could not be found, I suppose. Not much is known of the earlier Tudor structure that was on the site,but the fact that the present building is not perfectly perpendicular indicates that it may have been built, in part, on the foundations of an earlier building. Does that help,Bob?
March 4, 2011 at 6:23 pm
BobD
It does, Julie. Thank you, again. Just one last question: Who was Kirby?
March 7, 2011 at 7:35 am
jfwakefield
It was a something, rather than a person,Bob ;) Here’s n extract from the Yorkshire placenames website, which explains all:
Place names called Kirkby and Kirby are found in those parts of England settled by the Vikings, which is why they are commonly found in Yorkshire, Cumbria and Lincolnshire but absent from Northumberland and Durham. Kirkbys and Kirbys were farms or villages with a neighbouring kirk or church, as the word ‘by’ signifies a village of Viking origin. Like other commonly occuring place names such as Witton, Chester and Hutton, Kirkbys and Kirbys are given additional names to help distinguish one from another. Thus we have Kirkbymoorside, which was originally Kirkbymoorshead, the Kirkby at the head of the moor, Kirkby Fleetham situated near a homestead on a stream called a fleet and Kirkby Overblow which belonged to a smelter or ‘orblawere’. Kirkby Stephen in Cumbria is one of a number of Viking ‘by’ names in Cumbria’s Eden valley, but is so named because it was given to Stephen, the abbot of St Mary’s at York in Norman times. Kirkby Thore, also in the Eden valley belonged to a Viking called Thore. Yorkshire’s Kirkby Misperton, Kirkby Knowle, Kirkby Sigston and Kirkby Wiske were respectively the Kirkbys near the Misper tree, near the Knoll hill, near Sigga’s farm and on the River Wiske.
March 7, 2011 at 10:59 pm
BobD
Thanks, Julie–ever the font of British knowledge.