In our last post we discussed the life of Susannah Sackree, the nurse to Edward Knight’s children at his Godmersham home. We ought properly take this opportunity to consider what her role in the Knight household most probably entailed….so let’s take a look at the role of the Children’s Nurse in the early 19th century home.
The type of household that could expect to employ a children’s nurse, as opposed to the lesser incarnation of the Nursery-Maid, was one that had an income of at least £2-3000 per annum according to the Hints to the Formation of an Household given in The Complete Servant (1825) by Samuel and Sarah Adams.
The establishment would consist of at least:
Eight Female and eight Men–Servants; viz.- A Cook, Lady’s-Maid, two House-Maids, Nurse, Nursery-Maid, Kitchen-Maid, and Laundry –Maid; with a Butler, Valet, Coachman, Two Grooms A Footman and Two Gardeners.
According to the same source, a Children’s Nurse could expect to be paid between £10-25 per annum. And also had the right to expect to receive perquisites at the christenings of the children in her charge.
The Head Nurse should be expected to be, according to the same book, which was written by two experienced ex-servants,
…of a lively and cheerful disposition, perfectly good tempered, and clean and neat in her habits and person. She ought also to have been accustomed to the care and management of young children as all the junior branches of the family are entrusted to her care and superintendence, confiding in her skill, experience and attention. She usually takes the sole charge of the infant from it’s birth, when the parent suckles it; to assist her in the management of this and the other children in the nursery, she has under nurses assigned to her who are entirely under her control.
The Adams’ give detailed instructions for the day-to-day running of the nursery:
The youngest nurse , or nursery–maid, usually rises about six o’clock to light the fire, and so the household work of the nursery before the children are up, perhaps about seven o’clock, at which time the head nurse is dressed, and ready to bathe and wash them all over with a sponge and warm water; after which they are rubbed quite dry and dressed. This process, when there are several children usually occupies the nurse an hour and a half, when their breakfast is got ready and the children are placed at their meal in the most peaceful and orderly manner. After breakfast, if the weather be favourable, the children are taken out by the assistant nurse or nursery maid for air and exercise, and hour perhaps two, but not so long as to fatigue either of them. On their return, their hands and feet are washed, if damp or dirty, after which they attend to their lessons till dinner time. After dinner if it be fine weather, the children are again taken aboard for air and exercise and on their return again, after having their hands and feet washed, if necessary, they are in due time ,about eight o’clock, dressed and put to bed. The Head Nurse finds ample employment during the whole day in paying due attention to her infant charge in giving directions and in seeing that the whole business of the nursery is properly executed.
The Under-Nurse would attend to the older children in the family, whereas the Head Nurse was always expected to care for the babies:
The Under-Nurse is chiefly engaged in attending to the senior children,and is entirely under the control of the head nurse.She assists in getting them up in the morning, washing and dressing them; attends them at their meals and takes them out for air and exercise, and performs or assists in the performance of all the duties of the nursery, while the head nurse is chiefly engaged with the infant child.
Mrs Taylor, one of my favourite dispensers of advice, in her book, Practical Hints to Young Females on the Duties of a Wife, A Mother and a Mistress of a Family (1816)
give this advice regarding the ordering of the nursery, which would hold good today:
It is an error very prevalent but much to be deplored, that the nursery of all places should be destitute of neatness. Order, cleanliness and regularity have the happiest influence on the human mind and contribute more to keep the temper placid and the head clear, than many people are aware of. “Let every thing be done decently and in order” is a precept that should be extended from our religious concerns to all the affairs of life; and where this invaluable principle is associated with the habits of childhood, it may reasonably be expected to pervade the subsequent conduct, and contribute largely to individual and domestic happiness. Children who are always accustomed to replace their toys when done with; to make no unnecessary dirt of litter; to be punctual in their observance of time and place; will even from the force of habit, practise the same regularity in the more important concerns, on which the prosperity of future families may depend…
Interestingly, Mrs Taylor has this to say about the behaviour of employers to their good and faithful servants:
…let those who are possessed of such a treasure as a good servant, duly estimate their privilege, and be neither too rigid in their requirements, nor too sparing in their rewards. It is poor encouragement to a servant, if she is invariably blamed for what is wrong and never praised for what is right; and some respect should be paid to the feelings of human nature, which will not endure continual chiding, however deserving of it: both praises and rewards should be suitably dispensed; and if, when there is occasion to complain, appeals to reason were more frequent than they generally are, such reproof might have a gradual tendency to improve the character. The old domestic attached to a family, whose best days have been spent in faithful services is a lovely character, and entitled to every indulgence; and when an honest and tractable disposition is observed in the young, self-interest alone would dictate an endeavour to rear a servant of this description, by care and kindness by mingling patience and forbearance with instruction or reproof.
In Susannah Sackree , the Knights had a faithful and well-loved servant who gave service over a period of nearly 60 years. From the affectionate way in which she was written about by members of the family, she was truly, in the words of Mrs Taylor and Lady Catherine, a treasure.

































































10 comments
February 21, 2011 at 11:57 pm
Karen Field
I found this a great follow up to the previous post about Susanna Sackree. My thoughts about how Edward Knight’s home and other families of great privilege must run were expanded. I’m now trying to picture Cassandra Austen helping Elizabeth Knight when her confinements came and how that worked out with the nursery staff. We know Jane went, too, but she doesn’t seem to have been in demand as much as her sister. Thanks for the post.
February 23, 2011 at 1:44 pm
jfwakefield
Thanks, Karen, I thought it would be useful to outline the Head Nurse’s duties, so that we could relate them to Sackree’s story.
February 22, 2011 at 8:43 pm
Cathy Allen
Both of these, as Karen said, above, have been VERY interesting. YAY! another book (well, two books, actually, but I’d guess that Mrs Taylor’s Practical Hints>/i> is not available ;-) — I’d really like to see your library, as I’ve said many time before)!
You wrote that a nurse could expect to receive perquisites at the christenings of the children in her charge. Would that be money? I guess that it wouldn’t mean anything else, actually, but it is a very unusual custom to me; but then the whole nursing staff thing is out of my range of experience :-) I especially enjoyed reading Mrs. Taylor’s instructions on order and cleanliness; smart woman! Thanks, Julie
February 23, 2011 at 2:10 pm
jfwakefield
Most probably- there is evidence that JAne Austen left tips for Sackree in her lettres:
As I find, on looking into my affairs, that instead of being very rich I am likely to be very poor, I cannot afford more than ten shillings for Sackree; but as we are to meet in Canterbury I need not have mentioned this. It is as well, however, to prepare you for the sight of a sister sunk in poverty, that it may not overcome your spirits.Letter to Cassandra Austen, written from Godmersham, dated 24th August, 1805.
This was probalby a relict of the old custom of giving vails( monetary tips given to the staff when leaving after a visit) which had largely died out by the early years of the ninetheeth century though a few households kept up the custom.
February 23, 2011 at 8:53 pm
Cathy Allen
Thank you for the answer, Julie. It’s amazing that, given the Austen ladies’ limited income, and given that the custom had largely died out by the time of this letter, Jane Austen still provided for Sackree. It certainly shows Jane’s regard for her, yet again. Also, the way she worded her comment on it in her letter to Cassandra is typical Jane Austen, isn’t it? Delightful!
:-) Thank you,
CEA
February 25, 2011 at 10:09 am
jfwakefield
I am glad I managed to clear it up for you, Cathy:)
February 23, 2011 at 12:20 pm
Erica
Very interesting article, thanks very much. I think the experience of servants and employers in Amanda Vickery’s The Gentleman’s Daughter is an interesting counterpart to the ideals presented in some of the extracts above.
February 23, 2011 at 1:41 pm
jfwakefield
Hello, Erica,and welcome to Austen only. I understand what you are saying,but you don’t have to look as far as Amanda Vickery’s book for examples of dysfunctional employer/servant relationships, although I have been recommending that book as essential reading for fans of Jane Austen for over 12 years now ;) There are many examples in Jane Austens novels: lady’s maids in Sense and Sensibility and Mansfield Park cause havoc. The example of Rebecca, the maid of all work in the Price’s household , is hardly a model of mutual domestic felicity; and the jealousies between the staff of the households of Mrs Musgrove Senior and Junior in Persuasion all indicate that not all servants/mistresses were as highly regarded or esteemed as in Sackree’s case.
March 4, 2011 at 3:13 pm
Erica
Thanks for the excellent examples, it’s great to hear from someone who’s knowledge of the details of Austen’s novels far exceeds my own! Normally it’s me who brings up details of the novels in conversations to support my arguments! I’d forgotten about the servants you mention. I remember servants being spoken of kindly by Mr Woodhouse and Miss Bates.
Yes, the Vickery book is great. I hadn’t considered properly the complexity and individuality of the relationships between servant and employer before I read it. I’ve just started Behind Closed Doors. It seems excellent, but at the moment I’m most absorbed by Laurence Stone stuff on marriage and divorce: so fascinating!
March 7, 2011 at 7:36 am
jfwakefield
Ah, yes, lots to contemplate there, that is certain;) And lots to think about regarding servant/employer relationships;)