Back to Sudbury Hall in Derbyshire for the final part of the series of posts on the rooms used for the Pemberley interior scenes in the BBC’s 1995 adaptation of Pride and Prejudice. Part 1 is accessible here and Part 2 is accessible here. The rooms under discussion in this post are both on the first floor of the Hall: you can see their positions clearly marked on the floor plan below: they are the Long Gallery and the Queen’s Room:
(©National Trust )
The Queen’s Room is found by climbing the Great Staircase and taking the door to the left of the stairs.
This room is the grandest bedroom in the Hall, and was originally the state bedroom, known as the Great Stairhead Chamber in the 1670s when the Hall was first built. Below, you can see the entrance to the room leading from the Great Staircase.
It was called the Queen’s Room after its royal inhabitant, Queen Adelaide, Queen Consort of William IV, who leased Sudbury Hall from Lord Vernon and lived there near the end of her life in the 1840s.
(Queen Adelaide by Sir William Beechey)
We see the room briefly in the BBC’s adaptation, on the morning after the evening at Pemberley when the Gardiners and Elizabeth Bennet had joined Darcy Georgiana, the Hurts and the Bingleys at dinner.
Mr Darcy is shown getting dressed in his own rather exact manner before the great bed and the magnificent fireplace, just prior to riding to Lambton to visit Elizabeth Bennet at the inn.
We are also shown his manservant hurriedly bringing a selection of jackets to him….
The bed is magnificent….
and the lustrous silk lining the walls was restored in 1969, the new silk copied from the 18th century fabric which then decorated the walls.
The great chimney-piece is made of alabaster and was carved by William Wilson, the Leicester born carver who also worked on Lichfield Cathedral(not far from a place Jane Austen knew well, Hamstall Ridware ) during its restoration in the 1660s.
The room is sumptuous and friendly despite its size. It is one of the least intimidating state bedrooms I know….
The final room on our journey around the virtual Pemberley is another favourite of mine: the Long Gallery.
This is simply a stupendous room. A relict of a past, even when it was built in the 1670s. originally long galleries such as this stunning example which can be found at Aston Hall near Birmingham,
were used as places where exercise could be taken on a wet or wintery day and many are found in Elizabethan and Jacobean houses. It was unusual to add one to a house built in the 1670s. They were also places where family portraits could be exhibited with ease- all grouped together in one long room, a metaphor for the continuity and longevity of the family concerned. In the late 19th/ early 20th century the fashion was to use the rooms as long reception rooms, divided by clusters of furnishings and, in Sudbury’s case, bookcases.This is how the Long Gallery appeared in 1904.
The bookcases and collections of Greek and Etruscan vases have now gone and left in their place is this elegant room,with little to detract from the magical detail of the plaster decoration of the ceiling.
The ceiling is again the work of the London craftsmen, Bradbury and Pettifer (who also worked in the saloon). Its detail is astounding-there are even grasshoppers on the rosette above the central bay window.
We first see this room in the adaptation on the tour of Pemberley conducted by Mrs Reynolds.
The Gardiners and Elizabeth are shown along the gallery…
to the spot where Mr Darcy’s portrait hangs…
And Elizabeth Bennet again contemplates what might have been….
The portrait was especially commissioned by the BBC,and I understand that it was given to Colin Firth,who played Darcy, as a gift at the end of filming: he in turn gave it to this mother….
But last year it was sold and the proceeds given to charity
Go here to read about it: it fetched am amazing amount of money…..
We also see the gallery lit by moonlight, in the scene where Darcy is on his way to the saloon in the company of his dogs, remembering just how well his rapprochement with Elizabeth Bennet is proceeding….
And though it is never shown, here is the view from the Long Gallery to the gardens and lake below…
And that ends our tour of the interiors of this version of “Pemberley” : I do hope you have enjoyed it. Next in this series, Burghley House, the setting for Rosings in the 2005 production of Pride and Prejudice.
























































































14 comments
October 17, 2010 at 9:58 pm
Karen
Beautiful!
October 19, 2010 at 8:26 am
jfwakefield
Thanks,Karen!
October 18, 2010 at 12:20 pm
imogen88
I have adored this series, Julie and this post is no exception and completely in line with watching the mini again two nights ago. I was able to see detail more clearly, and I do love these interiors the most. Love it all. Especially the long gallery scenes, the concept of the room, is sublime. I even love the turn of century one. The P&P mini has lost none of its charm, I just fell in love with it all over again!
October 19, 2010 at 8:29 am
jfwakefield
Though it has its flaws, that series did do a comprehensive job of portraying the novel and was well loved by many I agree, Moni. Sudbury is a wonderful place to visit and I am glad I have been able to share the interiors with you all here.
October 19, 2010 at 12:37 am
Cathy Allen
Ah, Julie, you’ve done it again; you’ve given me a lovely little “vacation” from my work, thank you very much! Karen and Moni have said most of what I would have commented on: they are simply beautiful rooms!
I was surprised, however, by your statement that the long galleries were used as places where exercise could be taken on a wet or wintery day; that makes perfect sense. Of course! Now why do I not add one onto our house; it would be perfect for a damp day, like today. ;-)
I am always amazed at the hundreds of years of ancestor-portraits. That’s one of the scenes I liked so very much in this adaptation, which was missing in another adaptation (although if I had all those marble sculptures at my disposal, I would have found SOME way to include them!); it captures Jane Austen’s intent with the scene, in that it shows Darcy family’s longevity. Sudbury is a truly evocative place, thank you for sharing it, and the wonderful pictures!
CEA
October 19, 2010 at 8:35 am
jfwakefield
I think Sudbury was prefect for the impression it conveyed of the longevity, the taste and wealth of the Darcy family. The descriptions of the Pemberley House interiors in the book are fleeting and impressionistic,but I think that the choice of the Vernon’s Derbyshire home for the interiors was inspired.
October 19, 2010 at 5:07 pm
Anna
Oh I loved these scenes! And how interesting to hear about what happened to the Darcy painting after the series.
October 23, 2010 at 9:03 pm
jfwakefield
It was fun to write ,Im so glad you enjoyed it,Anna;)
October 23, 2010 at 2:43 am
BobD
Thanks, Julie, for another wonderful stroll through a few favorite locations. I envy Darcy even more now.
Like so many, I love the 1995 version of P&P. But as I was reviewing it, in portions, as my son and I read through the novel, I noticed some of the “flaws” you may be referencing. Can you recommend a good source of critique for the 1995 series that compares it to the novel?
October 23, 2010 at 9:09 pm
jfwakefield
I don’t know of a good source on the internet, Bob. What I will say is that, amongst other faults, I hated the characterisation of Mr Collins, from which all subsequent “lewd” interpretations have flowed. I also disliked the additions of unnecessary scenes-and yes, the plunging in the pond at Pemberley scene is one of those; surely Darcy would have had a luxurious bath house in the grounds and didn’t need to go dipping in a dirty pond? And of course it was madness not to allow Elizabeth to tell her father how Darcy helped the Bennets avoid social disaster.
October 25, 2010 at 5:02 am
BobD
Julie
I agree wholeheartedly with the flaws you identify with the exception of the characterization of Mr. Collins. I thought the actor did a wonderful job with lines that were true to the novel–and very funny. I’m not sure what you mean by saying that subsequent interpretations were “lewd”. (low, vulgar, indecent?) Collins was raised by his father who was a low, vulgar and maybe indecent sort. I didn’t see anything in him that betrayed unfair interpretation of the novel. Can you help me here?
Bob
October 25, 2010 at 7:36 am
jfwakefield
Certainly.The 1995 version gave a certain Uriah Heep-like unctuousness /creepiness to the character which, to me, is just not representative of Mr Collins of the text. He is a buffoon, but he is not vicious nor obsessed with sexual matters. The inclusion of the scene on the stairs at Longbourn with a scantily clad Lydia was rather unnecessary, in my view. This was taken one step further by Tom Hollander in the 2005 film. He based his interpretation of Mr Collins on his own observation that the character was obsessed with sex (see the documentary on the DVD of the making of the film) The additional line in the pulpit scene in Hunsford church was indeed lewd in my opinion, and not one that Mr Collins would make, even accidentally. The Mr Collins in the ITV TV series “Lost In Austen” carried this interpretation based on the characters now “perceived” and “established” obsession with sex, one step further further: he was a sexual creep par excellence. It seems to me that this has all stemmed from the portrayal in the 1995 version, and has illuminated a general trend that has seen old scripts re-interpreted in new adaptations, and not the original text (see, for example, the 2007 Persuasion which was, IMHO an interpretation of the 1995 version, and the 2008 Sense and Sensibility which owed rather a lot textually to the 1995 Ang Lee/Emma Thompson version). The best interpretation and physical representation of the character (but not the best version of P+P) was in the1980 BBC adaptation written by Fay Weldon. All my humble opinion of course.
October 26, 2010 at 5:52 pm
Raquel
Julie,
when I read your posts I want to move to England.
Your England, Jane’s England.
Invite you to a pint or cup of tea and ask you to tell more and more about your country, its history and Jane!
October 26, 2010 at 6:39 pm
jfwakefield
You would be very welcome, Raquel and I’d love to be able to share a cup of tea with you around my kitchen table while taking about Jane!