but not the Deirdre Le Faye edition…..the Brabourne edition;-)
This may initially appear to you as a strange thing to include in a book review, a set of books that have been out of print for over 100 years…but wait …you well probably be as surprised and pleased as I was to discover that Cambridge University Press have recently taken on the concept of print-on-demand books and have made it into something that has the potential to be very special indeed.
They are re-issuing scholarly out of print books from the unimaginably wide range of books in their libraries.
The edition of Jane Austen’s letters edited by Jane Austen’s nephew, Lord Brabourne, is among the first digitally reprinted books to be issued in the new series –The Cambridge Library Collection
It comes in the form of two very reasonably priced volumes, both in paperback editions.
They are facsimiles of the original books, first published in 1884 by Richard Bentley and Son.
The originals have become so expensive that I have long since put my reasonably-priced-when-bought-all those- years-ago volumes on The Not To Be Touched Shelf.
So now I am pleased to own these two volumes in this accessible form so that I can examine them once again without fear of breaking the spine, spilling tea over them or otherwise damaging them in my usual klutzy way.
This Brabourne collection is, of course, available on-line, and has been superseded by the Le Faye Edition, but it still has some merits, the introductions by Lord Barbourne and interesting family documents etc, and there is a charm in examining the first proper selection of Jane Austen’s letters in its original form. Especially when the original volumes are now so scarce and…so ruinously and hideously expensive. And despite, or rather because of being a fond Kindle owner, I find I do like to hold a book in my hands, rather than read one on line, especially if I’m doing it for prolonged periods of time. So this re-issue is wonderful.
My only gripe is that the two illustrations in the books are quite fuzzy and indistinct.
The portrait supposedly of Jane Austen as a child, commonly known as The Rice Portrait ,
is rendered (as in the original books) in black and white but as you can see, below, this version is very blurred :
The view of Godmersham from The History and Topographical Survey of the County of Kent: Volume 7 (1798) by Edward Hasted in Volume II of the letters is also not particularly clear…
…especially if you compare it with the original print , of which I have a copy
However this is nitpicking on my part, a minor quibble. It is the text that is important and these books deliver it in a perfectly legible way.
The Cambridge University Press have only just begun to reissue many titles on many subjects in this series. Follow this link here to read a general introduction, and this link here gives the current list, subject by subject
Below is a very lovely and informative video of the whole process-accompanied by heavenly music by William Byrd sung by the choir of Girton College. Just click on it to play….
I love the idea that they are open to suggestions for further reprints and I am compiling a list with a few suggestions. Their own collection of books must be mind bogglingly immense, but if you suggest a title of merit that they do not own or is not out of copyright but out of print ,they will attempt to pursue the matter and try to produce their own edition of the books.
As someone whose ancestor was John Baskerville, who was commissioned to print books for Cambridge University in the 18th century, I have always had an affection for the CUP. I can only laud this whole process, and urge you to take advantage of this opportunity to own your own copies of hard to find and sometimes impossibly expensive texts.






































































11 comments
February 23, 2010 at 11:15 pm
Cathy Allen
This is very exciting, thanks for letting us know!
CEA
February 24, 2010 at 1:29 pm
jfwakefield
My pleasure!
February 24, 2010 at 2:03 pm
Deb
I had never seen the Rice portrait before. Why do they think it’s of Jane?
And my second question….would that have been the style of dress when she was that age. I thought the high waisted dresses were 1800 and later.
I have to stop spending money on books! I forced myself to read the Amanda Vickery book slooowwllyy to make it last. Next up, Roy Porter and then the bio of George III I bought on line.
February 24, 2010 at 2:09 pm
jfwakefield
Ah now thats a long and vexed question…..Go here for a brief overview of it and if it is really Jane ( Me ,Im not an art expert but I doubt it)
February 24, 2010 at 3:20 pm
Deb
Hmmm….interesting.
The debate reminds me of the documentary my husband and I watched about a woman who bought an unknown Jackson Pollack in a thrift shop for $5………..the art world rejects it even though there is a fingerprint of Pollack’s on the back of the painting and the paint chemically matches the paint on the floor of his studio. Provenance is everything.
February 24, 2010 at 3:24 pm
jfwakefield
It is interesting,and I found Brian Sewell’s comments thought provoking.
February 26, 2010 at 11:41 am
imogen88
Well, this is good news! Thanks so much for these updates, Julie, as it keeps me up to date with all that is happening over there. Fantastic.
February 26, 2010 at 8:02 pm
jfwakefield
Such a fabulous idea, isn’t it?
February 26, 2010 at 11:47 am
imogen88
BTW, loved the video, the step by step process fascinating to learn about. Good to see none of these books will be lost to time, I adore this kind of preservation and the way they consult for ideas. So interesting and the music was indeed lovely!
February 26, 2010 at 8:02 pm
jfwakefield
I can see a lot of future purchases here ;-)
February 27, 2010 at 3:21 am
imogen88
LOL!