Yesterday we explored the kind of kitchen that Catherine Morland hoped would be on display at Northanger Abbey…poor soul.
What she finds is the complete opposite of what she expected: all her hopes, based on her readings of horrid novels, led her to believe abbeys were staffed by a few ancient servants and meals were cooked in similarly ancient mouldering rooms:
With the walls of the kitchen ended all the antiquity of the abbey; the fourth side of the quadrangle having, on account of its decaying state, been removed by the general’s father, and the present erected in its place. All that was venerable ceased here. The new building was not only new, but declared itself to be so; intended only for offices, and enclosed behind by stable–yards, no uniformity of architecture had been thought necessary. Catherine could have raved at the hand which had swept away what must have been beyond the value of all the rest, for the purposes of mere domestic economy; and would willingly have been spared the mortification of a walk through scenes so fallen, had the general allowed it; but if he had a vanity, it was in the arrangement of his offices; and as he was convinced that, to a mind like Miss Morland’s, a view of the accommodations and comforts, by which the labours of her inferiors were softened, must always be gratifying, he should make no apology for leading her on. They took a slight survey of all; and Catherine was impressed, beyond her expectation, by their multiplicity and their convenience. The purposes for which a few shapeless pantries and a comfortless scullery were deemed sufficient at Fullerton, were here carried on in appropriate divisions, commodious and roomy. The number of servants continually appearing did not strike her less than the number of their offices. Wherever they went, some pattened girl stopped to curtsy, or some footman in dishabille sneaked off. Yet this was an abbey! How inexpressibly different in these domestic arrangements from such as she had read about — from abbeys and castles, in which, though certainly larger than Northanger, all the dirty work of the house was to be done by two pair of female hands at the utmost. How they could get through it all had often amazed Mrs. Allen; and, when Catherine saw what was necessary here, she began to be amazed herself.
Before we discuss the modern kitchen, I think we ought to consider the domestic offices which so baffled Catherine ;what would they have been like?
Northanger Abbey is clearly built around a quadrangle, and the modern block of domestic offices makes up one whole side. Katherine is used to having only a scullery and some pantries at home at the rectory at Fullerton:she is not used to the way the domestic offices of the rich were arranged in the late 18th /early 19th centuries.
Let’s see if we can try and envisage what the General’s Domestic Offices looked like…..
This illustration is taken from my copy of The Country House Kitchen by Pamela Sambrook and Peter Brears, and shows the type of rooms that amazed poor Catherine. Do remember, all the illustrations here can be enlarged by clicking on them)
There are two plans, showing two sets of domestic offices. The basement floor of Harewood House in Yorkshire the homes of the Lascelles family,
which was designed by John Carr between 1759-1791. Here are links to its Still Room, Kitchen, Servants Hall, Steward’s Room, Pastry Roomand Vegetable scullery
and Newnham in Oxfordshire built 1759-71.
The codes for the rooms are as follows:
BH- Bake House
BP- Butler’s Pantry
C -Cellars
D- Dairy
HR-Housekeepers Room
K – Kitchen
L – Larder
PS- Pastry
S- Store
SR -Steward’s Room
ST- Still Room
VG -Ventilation Gap
At Petworth in Sussex,
…this was the plan of the domestic offices which were built in a block separate to the main house:
You can clearly see that a large, rich household required more than a scullery and pantries to support its exalted way of life.
And of course all this impressive newness set amidst an old abbey might have been inspired by Jane Austen’s knowledge of and visit to such a place-Stoneleigh Abbey in Warwickshire- which she visited in 1806.
The Austen ladies-Jane and Cassandra plus Mrs Austen- went there to accompany their cousin, the Reverend Thomas Leigh to ensure his inheritance to the property. You can see from my photograph above that behind the classical frontage of the house there is a range of ancient, medieval buildings which were part of the original abbey.
Here is a drawing of that range:
This is a plan drawn up by architects to the trust which converted Stoneleigh into a number of individual residences, and you can see that Stoneleigh is also built- like Northanger- around a quadrangle :
Mrs Austen left us a magically detailed letter -dated August 13th 1806- to her daughter-in-law, Mary Austen, second wife of James, and she found while exploring the abbey she thought inextricably of Gothic imagery:
Behind the smaller drawing room is the state bed chamber, with a high dark crimson velvet bed: an alarming apartment just fit for a heroine…
And she found the sheer size of the place, especially the domestic offices, almost intimidating: I say almost for I think very little intimidated Mrs Austen:
We can now find our way about it, I mean the best part; as to the offices (which were the old Abbey) Mr Leigh almost despairs of ever finding his way about them. I have proposed his setting up directing posts at the Angles.
And the range of breakfast food available to them, quite astounding:
At nine in the morning we meet and say our prayers in a handsome chapel, the pulpit etc now hung with black. Then follows breakfast, consisting of chocolate coffee and tea, plumb cake, pound cake, hot rolls cold rolls, bread and butter and dry toast for me. The House-Steward (a fine large respectable looking man) orders all these matters.
I think Jane Austen turned her experience of Stoneleigh Abbey upside down when writing Northanger Abbey . At Stoneleigh there was an ancient range of buildings completing the quadrangle ( unlike at Northanger ) and also an amazing number of domestic offices. I must admit to loving this section of Northanger Abbey, where poor old Catherine’s imagination is stymied at every turn. Her limited domestic experience is confounded by what she sees at Northanger: to imagine that large households were managed by two female embers of staff- her impression of life in an abbey is of course based on her reading of her horrid books-is not wise.Even that dullard Mrs Allen had doubted they portrayed real life! Poor Catherine is about to receive an almighty shock when she goes hunting around Mrs Tilney’s bedroom….letting her imagination run riot, so that it impinges on real life…not a good idea.
How inexpressibly different in these domestic arrangements from such as she had read about — from abbeys and castles, in which, though certainly larger than Northanger, all the dirty work of the house was to be done by two pair of female hands at the utmost. How they could get through it all had often amazed Mrs. Allen; and, when Catherine saw what was necessary here, she began to be amazed herself.
Now we have seen exactly what constituted a grand range of domestic offices , tomorrow what we shall explore what modern innovations were available in General Tilney’s kitchen…which was only a tiny part of the Northanger Abbey Domestic Offices.






























































15 comments
February 10, 2010 at 11:58 pm
Cathy Allen
Wow, what a place! I’ve seen pictures of Stoneleigh before this, but I never knew what I was looking at. It is really fascinating, Julie. Do you know how many staff members were required to run this kitchen?
Thanks for explaining, and for answering,
CEA
P.S. From the little I’ve read, I think you’re absolutely correct: I think very little intimidated Mrs Austen! She seems to have been one strong lady!
February 12, 2010 at 2:58 pm
jfwakefield
Looking at The Complete Servant,a rich household would probably have employed at least 10 servants involved in the kitchen- French man cook, scullion,maids, under-maids etc.
I think I ought to do more on Stoneleigh…..*Light Bulb Switches On*
February 12, 2010 at 6:44 pm
Cathy Allen
Thanks vey much, Julie.
Wow — at least 10 in the KITCHEN; blows me away! I keep thinking of “Upstairs, Downstairs,” Mrs. Bridges and Ruby. It was 100 years later, but it’s because of the fact that it’s in England, and it’s a visual (I’m a visual learner.) This is one of the reasons I so appreciate your pictures, i.e., the gothic kitchen, etc: I can see it, so it moves me from “Upstairs, Downstairs” back in time, and thus helps me to think forward into Georgian times…if that makes any sense. Excuse my verbosity, again!
Regarding your Stoneleigh lightbulb, I vote YES; go for it!
Thanks again,
CEA
P.S. adding the Porter book to my wish list, where it joins the Vickery one!
February 12, 2010 at 11:35 pm
Deb
Amanda Vickery’s The Gentleman’s Daughter is out in paperback and isnt quite as pricy. It is excellent reading.
Deb
February 13, 2010 at 12:59 am
jfwakefield
Thanks Deb, but I think Cathy has already been recommended to read The Gentlemen’s Daughter: in fact IIRC we read it together at an internet GroupRead I led a few years back!
February 12, 2010 at 4:18 am
Karen
I do love the descriptions and drawings of the “domestic offices.” They are almost more interesting to me than the grand drawing rooms or State apartments of these stately homes.
As for Mrs. Austen’s description of the sumptuous breakfast spread: how typical that SHE would opt for “dry toast.” (I have no high opinion of her after reading a few biographies of JA.) ; )
February 12, 2010 at 2:54 pm
jfwakefield
I love them too_Im sure more people would love history at school if it included social history details. Well, thats my theory anyhow
February 12, 2010 at 1:28 pm
Deb
Are the letters of Mrs Austen published anywhere? I have Jane’s letters in the volume edited by Deirdre LeFay but have never seen one of the family letters.
And the new Amanda Vickery book came yesterday and I had to look longingly at it most of the afternoon while I did my bookwork and house chores….
I did go to the library last night looking for a history of Georgian England–my American education only gave me a faint whiff of what was happening in England during that time. The library had nothing…Can you recommend one that is obtainable on this side of the pond?
February 12, 2010 at 2:51 pm
jfwakefield
Some are available in The Austen Papers(1942) edited by Richard Arthur Austen-Leigh. This is now a very rare and expensive volume( on my not to be touched shelf) : this book was also reprinted in Jane Austen: Famiy History edited by David Gilson.That is also out of print and also ferociously expensive.*sigh*.
I rhink you will love Behind Closed Doors
What area of 18th century English history do you want to look at,Deb?
February 12, 2010 at 4:17 pm
Deb
My main interest in history is the social aspects of it. I spent a good five years reading all I could of Edwardian history and found that unless I understood the political and economic climate, the social history wasnt as meaningful. I am finding in reading what I can find of 18th c social history and literature that I need to get at least a basic understanding of what is happening generally, if that makes sense. ;o) So a basic book would be nice.
And I live on a farm outside a very small town with a craptastic library system. I usually travel into Madison, WI with it’s university library system when I’m really digging around, weather permitting.
Thank you!
Deb
February 12, 2010 at 5:41 pm
jfwakefield
Why not try, as a general starting point, the late Roy Porter’s book, English Society in the Eighteenth Century .This is a well- written, very readable social history of a momentous time in English history, and I think it will help you set things in context
February 12, 2010 at 11:33 pm
Deb
I have books that are Not to Be Loaned as well. In fact, most of my collections of books pertaining to the Regency and Jane Austen are on that shelf as well as the knitting and knitting history books I’ve been collecting for 40 years!
A used copy of the Porter book is winging it’s way to me now! I love book shopping on line.
Thanks for the suggestion! I am reading Venetia Murray’s book on high society which is amusing and informative. It’s given me lots of bunny trails to follow.
Deb
February 13, 2010 at 12:52 am
jfwakefield
A caveat about the Veneita Murray book: its not a rigourous as most, gets facts attributions etc incorrect. An internet search on the errors in it might put you on your guard
I wouldn’t recommend relying too much on that one.
February 13, 2010 at 1:04 pm
Deb
Ahhh….historical fiction! I have a space on my shelves for that. ;o)
February 13, 2010 at 1:05 pm
jfwakefield
LOL_ sad but true, in this case