You were both talking of other things; of business, shows of cattle, or new drills;
Emma Chapter 54
Mr Knightly is portrayed by Jane Austen as a very concerned landlord, eager to share with his tenant new developments in agricultural practices.
And well he might for the late 18th /early 19th century was a time of great improvement in and change in the British countryside. Let see why Our Hero is so concerned with innovations in Agriculture and what it says about him and his character.
Prior to the 18th century Britain was farmed mainly on the strip field system, a system that had prevailed since the medieval period. More than half the countryside was in fact uncultivated- being open commons, moorland and heaths.
The introduction of the Enclosure Acts in the early 18th century began to change this rapidly, and the change became even more pronounced after 1760,and the beginning of the reign of George III.
As a result of enclosures, large areas of land could be cultivated by a single landowner, and this led to the emphasis being on achieving higher and better yields of crops. The introduction of the seed drill by Jethro Tull and crop rotation system and fodder crops -wheat, barley, turnips and clover -by Charles “Turnip” Townshend, the second Viscount Townshend of Norfolk improved the efficiency of sowing crops. The improvements and ready availability of fodder crops meant that animals could now survive winter in a far healthier state than previously.
Robert Bakewell a Leicestershire farmer also began to improve livestock through selective breeding. His aim was to provide enough meat to feed every household in the kingdom with meat. The population of Britain over the course of the 18rhy century rose to 10 million so this was a timely intervention. The outbreak of war with France in 1803 added further serious impetus to agricultural improvements: home production of food became ever and vitally important, and this led to a massive expansion of British farming until the defeat of Napoleon in 1815.
The encouragement to improve all matters agricultural was lead from the highest levels in society. George III had serious examples of model farms at Windsor, Kew and Mortlake and contributed articles to the Annals of Agriculture under the non de plume of Ralph Richardson. As Arthur Young the journalist and proprietor of the Annals of Agriculture, wrote
We are all farmers now from the Duke to the apprentice.
And indeed as is shown in Emma the common interest in improving agricultural mater was a great social leveler: Robert Martin is thought of as a friend by the great landowner in the area, Mr Knightley.
This serious involvement of the great and the good was on public display at the great sheep-shearing events held in the summer on the great estates around the country, the most famous being those held by Thomas Coke of Norfolk (seen here with his prized Southdown sheep on his estate at Holkham)
and the 5th duke of Bedford at Woburn.
The sheep shearings were held over a period of 3-4 days and combined an opportunity for framers, grand and small, to meet “on common ground” in order share new methods of husbandry of both animals and crops.
This is a picture of the Woburn Sheepshearing by George Garrad circa 1804. The range of social classes present and participating in these events is sown by some sketches made by the artists of individuals attending the event:
Arthur Young
Lord Winchelsea
Samuel Whitbread, the fabulously rich brewing heir and M.P.
Sir Joseph Banks, of Kew gardens
And Holland, the Shepherd.
These sheep shearings were the forerunners of the great agricultural shows that are still held today during the summer in Britain. The American Ambassador to Britain, William Rush, attending the shearing at Holkham in 1819 was impressed by the informal atmosphere and how Thomas Coke led the
Informal discussion and explanation on everything connected with agriculture in the broadest sense on his grounds at the dinner table and even more impressively on horseback…he plays the part of the old English country gentleman as he rides from field to field attended by friends who are also mounted
At the same time as a result of the interest in matters agricultural , agricultural societies were also formed on nearly every county as forum where interested parties could meet and discuss innovations in this sphere. These societies were also encouraged by the highest in society:
Thomas Coke encouraged improvements in land by giving a piece of silver plate to the value of five guineas to the Norfolk Agricultural Society, to be awarded
To such person as shall convert the greatest area of waste or unimproved meadows in the most complete manner
Sometimes the sheep shearings were not to everyone’s tastes. Arthur Young eventually gave up attending them In 1806 he wrote to Thomas Coke refusing an invitation to attend a follows:
There is not one feature that would carry a Christian there for pleasure, but a thousand to repel him and this is so much the case with all public meetings that are odious. The Norfolk farmer are rich and profligate; coarse oaths and profanities salute the ear at every turn; and the gentlemen and great when they are without ladies are too apt to be as bad as the mob and many of them much worse…much as I love agriculture I can renounce it with more pleasure than I can partake of it thus contaminated
Seems to me that he and the unreconstructed Emma might get on…….
Back to why this was all connected for the good with Mr Knightley. As Susanna Wade Martins writes in her fabulous biography of Thomas Coke( more on that later) :
One of the first duties of a patriot was the improvement of his estate, seen as a moral obligation by the middle of the eighteenth century….By the time Thomas Coke inherited (Holkham in 1776-jfw) the roles of landlord and tenant in the business of commercial farming had become established. It was the duty of the landlord to provide the fixed capital in the form of fields, farm roads and buildings and the tenant the working capital such as seed, stock and implements for the farm. In times of farming prosperity when prospective tenants were numerous the landowner could try and pass on to the tenant some responsibilities such as the hedging of fields …Similarly in times of agricultural depression when tenants were more difficult to find and retain the landlord might have to take some of these responsibilities back…The responsibilities of the landlord had been fully understood by Cokes predecessors and were ones that they had taken very seriously.
So, Mr Knightley, portrayed as concerned about his tenants welfare and well-being and being interested in all matters agricultural was being also portrayed as a great patriot, not only caring for those immediately around him but for the prosperity and survival of the country as a whole in time of war.
Jane Austen clearly viewed absentee landlords with contempt: see her portrayal of another Norfolk man, Henry Crawford in Mansfield Park who is content to let his agent run his estate there even though he knows he is not of the highest character. Pity his poor tenants in that case.
Mr Kinightley’s tenants have no such fears.
As Lord Kames wrote in The Gentleman Farmer (1787):
Every gentleman farmer must of course be a patriot…in fact if there be any remaining patriotism in the nation it is to be found among that class of men.
No wonder Emma adores him…..























18 comments
Comments feed for this article
February 3, 2010 at 1:21 pm
Julie
In Georgette Heyer’s “A Civil Contract” (which I have just finished re-reading), the hero, Lord Lynton, is very interested in experimental farming, and Mr. Coke is mentioned several times. In the book, Lord Lynton visits family friends who are also landowners and who are also interested in new methods and techniques for farming. I had not paid much attention to the significance of this until your post. Thank you as always!
-Julie P.
February 3, 2010 at 1:26 pm
jfwakefield
Thank you. I think you will like Fridays planned review of Susanna Wade Martin’s book(s) about Thomas Coke- one of my heros too by the way.
Emma is , of all Jane Austen’s novels, the one most openly concerned with land, stewardship and the correct practical usage of it, IMHO. I think it is vitally important for us to realise that Mr Knightley’s interest in agricultural concerns was not just a fad or caprice but an indication of how very patriotic he was.Digging for victory quite literally
February 4, 2010 at 4:02 pm
Julie
As is the case with all your posts, I am looking forward to it!
-Julie P.
February 3, 2010 at 6:59 pm
Cathy Allen
Quite wonderful information, thank you my dear.
First, LOL, to reveal my ignorance of this whole thing (hey, I’m a Californian, you know, all we do is watch what Hollywood does — NOT!) but I did think Jethro Tull was just a Rock band from my youth!
Oh well…
Second, I’m amazed by George III’s involvement; I had no idea! I know that the present Prince of Wales has a real interest in farming, but I didn’t know that some of his ancestors did. Gives me a whole new picture of George III to consider.
Thomas Coke certainly sounds a lot like Mr. Knightley, whom I happen to love, too. I look forward to your Friday review. I think I’ll reread “A Civil Contract” soon, too, thanks to the other Julie’s comment.
Lastly, the pictures are WONDERFUL, thank you, as always, for them, and that we can enlarge them. They add SO MUCH to my understanding.
CEA
February 4, 2010 at 1:08 pm
Deb
I found this interesting since I had always thought of Mr Knightley’s interst in agricultural improvements as stemming from his sense of stewardship and responsible land ownership just as Emma’s visits to the poor are part of her responsiblity as mistress of Hartfield.
As the present owner of Donwell Abbey he would want to improve the estate and it’s income as a way of increasing the legacy passed on to his children. That there might be a pressing need for the food he grows in light of the war didnt even occur to me….
You are, as always, very enlightening! I really enjoy your blog.
Deb in Wisconsin
February 4, 2010 at 1:19 pm
jfwakefield
Thanks, Deb. I think its easy to forget that the war had a great financial/economic impact :even more so when the wars ended and the slump-very similar to our own present crisis,began.
Of course Mr Knightley was keen as a concerned landowner to see that his estate was in good heart and could be passed on to his heirs intact and probably in a better state than when he inherited it, but there were also pressing concerns during the Napoleonic Wars which coloured a lot of his behaviour( his “lack” of horses for example!) These points, made very subtly by Jane Austen, are easily overlooked today
February 4, 2010 at 2:22 pm
Deb
I also examined the picture of the sheep shearing you posted. I have two questions.
In the lower left corner there is a head arising from what looks like a coffin to me….what could that be?
Also, there are depictions of children in the picture but none of women, even women in the, for lack of a better word, lower classes that would have been involved in the raising and spinning of wool.
Could you offer any enlightenment? I am a spinner and knitter and all things sheep and wool fascinate me.
Deb in Wisconsin
February 4, 2010 at 2:40 pm
jfwakefield
The head is difficult to make out I agree, but I’ve looked at a black and white engraving of that picture and it appears to be a classical head( or bust) which appears to be on sale at a stall at the sheep shearing. If you would like I can send you a copy of that engraving by email, Deb.let me know.
Women demonstrating weaving were sometimes present at these shearings, Deb. In 1821 for example, the Holkham Shearing staged an exhibition of spinning and carding flax by young girls from the flax mill at the village of South Creake which was on the Holkham estate.
Does that help?
February 4, 2010 at 2:26 pm
Alexa Adams
I wonder if you would do a companion piece to this post, highlighting some if the negatives of enclosure. In the vast multitude of JAFF I have read, both perspectives are represented. This post does a wonderful job of detailing the positives and I would love to read your take on the other side of the debate.
February 4, 2010 at 2:31 pm
jfwakefield
Hmm…. as Jane Austen only glancingly referred to the poor in her novels,-and her texts are the main focus of my site here- I don’t really want to devote much time to it here. The poor in Highbury may have been affected by enclosures,etc but we are not specifically told that they are. Id rather not speculate too far away from the text here ,and Im sure there are many other places/books that deal with that subject
.
I do hope you understand my position
In turn, may I ask, what is JAFF?
February 5, 2010 at 12:22 pm
Alexa Adams
I perfectly understand, though I think Emma’s attention to the poor of Highbury could be seen as a premise for such a discussion. JAFF stands for Jane Austen Fan Fiction and many authors have gone way beyond the bounds of what Austen actually included, particularly in the case of politics and sexuality. I have very mixed feelings about this, not liking to trespass beyond two inches of ivory myself, but it has led me to ask many questions that remain unanswered. In particular, The Pemberley Chronicles series by Rebecca Ann Collins endows the cast of Pride and Prejudice with all kinds of reformist tendencies. This post stirred up these thoughts, as you present stewardship of the land from the opposite perspective.
February 5, 2010 at 1:07 pm
jfwakefield
Ah ! Thank you-I wasn’t at all sure what your acronym meant
February 4, 2010 at 3:02 pm
Deb
I would love to see the black and white version!
Have you, by any chance, read the books by Laurel Thatcher Ulrich? She writes about the same time frame in “the colonies” buy her book, The Midwives Tale, is a marvelous stitching together of history from one small pocket diary of a midwife in Maine in the 1700’s. If you cannot find one on your side of the pond, let me know and I can pick one up for you and post it.
Deb in Wisconsin
February 4, 2010 at 3:03 pm
jfwakefield
Email coming you way ;-0
And yes, I do have that book,Deb-but it was so very kind of you to offer to send it. Thank you,I appreciate that very much.
February 9, 2010 at 9:23 am
Lizzy
Wonderful post!
Can you expand on the lack of horses? and I remember you once promised during a group read to explain your theory on why Mr Knightley is low on cash, but I think I missed that post. Do I remember rightl-ey?
February 9, 2010 at 10:20 am
jfwakefield
The lack of saddle horses was because Mr Knightley preferred not to pay tax on them-which was quite high at this period. He kept a carriage, and hired horses (which were available to hire from the Crown Inn) when he needed them. Does that help?
February 10, 2010 at 4:39 am
Lizzy
Yes, it does. Thank you!
February 10, 2010 at 9:45 am
jfwakefield
Jolly good!