Frank Churchill placed a word before Miss Fairfax. She gave a slight glance round the table, and applied herself to it. Frank was next to Emma, Jane opposite to them — and Mr. Knightley so placed as to see them all; and it was his object to see as much as he could, with as little apparent observation. The word was discovered, and with a faint smile pushed away. If meant to be immediately mixed with the others, and buried from sight, she should have looked on the table instead of looking just across, for it was not mixed; and Harriet, eager after every fresh word, and finding out none, directly took it up, and fell to work. She was sitting by Mr. Knightley, and turned to him for help. The word was blunder…..
… This gallant young man, who seemed to love without feeling, and to recommend himself without complaisance, directly handed over the word to Miss Fairfax, and with a particular degree of sedate civility entreated her to study it. Mr. Knightley’s excessive curiosity to know what this word might be, made him seize every possible moment for darting his eye towards it, and it was not long before he saw it to be Dixon.
Jane Fairfax’s perception seemed to accompany his; her comprehension was certainly more equal to the covert meaning, the superior intelligence, of those five letters so arranged. She was evidently displeased; looked up, and seeing herself watched, blushed more deeply than he had ever perceived her, and saying only, “I did not know that proper names were allowed,” pushed away the letters with even an angry spirit, and looked resolved to be engaged by no other word that could be offered. Her face was averted from those who had made the attack, and turned towards her aunt.
Emma, Chapter 41
Whatever we think of the Knightley brothers, it has to be admitted that they are most acute observers of the scene around them. John Knightley correctly divines that Mr Elton is “romantically” keen on Emma, and Mr Knightley, here in chapter 41, realises that there is something more sinister to this seemingly innocent game of Regency Scrabble, one of the many instances of word play in the novel.
These letters were but the vehicle for and trick. It was a child’s play, chosen to conceal a deeper game on Frank Churchill’s part.
And how clever of Jane Austen to show via the medium of a child’s plaything, that these so-called adults were acting both childishly and recklessly.
They really should know better…all of them.
The alphabet that Emma’s nephews played with probably looked something like this:
But there were other versions. The photographs above and below show some I have collected: small ivory letters in an ivory box, carved like an heart-shaped basket, circa 1810:
Learning through play was part of John Locke’s(1632-1704) educational theory:
Play-things, I think, children should have, and of divers sorts; but still to be in the custody of their tutors or some body else, whereof the child should have in his power but one at once, and should not be suffered to have another but when he restored that. This teaches them betimes to be careful of not losing or spoiling the things they have; whereas plenty and variety in their own keeping, makes them wanton and careless, and teaches them from the beginning to be squanderers and wasters. These, I confess, are little things, and such as will seem beneath the care of a governor; but nothing that may form children’s minds is to be overlooked and neglected, and whatsoever introduces habits, and settles customs in them, deserves the care and attention of their governors, and is not a small thing in its consequences.
See: Some Thoughts Concerning Education(1692)
This idea was promoted also by Richard Edgeworth and his novelist daughter, Maria (friends of Jane Austen’s aunt and uncle, the Leigh Perrots) in their book Practical Education:
Many puzzles are highly ingenious;and as far as they can exercise the invention or the patience of young people they are useful….Care however should be taken to separate the ideas of deceit and ingenuity and to prevent children from glorifying in the posession of a secret.
(See: Chapter 1, Practical Education(1780)
What a pity it is that Frank and Emma do not seem to have read this book….

























































11 comments
January 27, 2010 at 12:56 pm
Alexa Adams
I didn’t know these were purchased sets – I was very much of the impression that Emma had made the alphabet for her nephews’ amusement, due to Mr. Woodhouse “fondly pointing out, as he took up any stray letter near him, how beautifully Emma had written it.”
January 27, 2010 at 1:46 pm
jfwakefield
Oh yes, they were certainly made commercially by makers of “toys” – not in our sense of the word, but in the 18th century sense of objects of virtu and curiosity-and there is a collectors market in them today. Emma most probably bought a blank set of ivory tiles-which were also available for purchase by accomplished ladies – to be decorated for her nephews at home. Mr Woodhosue fondly remembers, IIRC- how beautifully Emma had written the letters, so I rather get the impression she had written in ink,the alphabet on small pieces of bought and turned ivory or wood. Does that help?
There is another one I know of on display at Chawton at the Jane Austen House Museum: very similar to mine but kept in a very different and more elaborate box. I love the fact that the curators there always ensure that their alphabet always spells out Blunder and Dixon too, in its display cabinet.
January 27, 2010 at 2:13 pm
Alexa Adams
That helps enormously. Thank you for the comprehensive answer – this has long been something that puzzled me. You are a remarkable wealth of information.
January 27, 2010 at 2:15 pm
jfwakefield
Thank you! I know just how you feel (which is why this site exists,I suppose)- solving some tiny point in the text can keep me up at nights. I will tell you one day of the joy when I finally found an illustration of a tea board after searching for one for years!
January 27, 2010 at 10:22 pm
Ramya
I did not realize that Mr. Woodhouse was talking about the “scrabble” letters. I was thinking it was a letter Emma had written to someone. Who says Emma is too lazy?
January 27, 2010 at 11:39 pm
jfwakefield
In chapter 41 the reference to “letters” is to the ones with which the characters are playing the rather nasty game:
The quietness of the game made it particularly eligible for Mr. Woodhouse, who had often been distressed by the more animated sort, which Mr. Weston had occasionally introduced, and who now sat happily occupied in lamenting, with tender melancholy, over the departure of the “poor little boys,” or in fondly pointing out, as he took up any stray letter near him, how beautifully Emma had written it.
The stray letter refers to one of the alphabet letters Emma had created , not a piece of correspondence.
January 29, 2010 at 3:26 pm
Ramya
Now it is so clear! Thanks, Julie!
January 27, 2010 at 2:28 pm
Deb
The little ivory box is beautiful. I had pictured something like Scrabble tiles when I read this scene–yours are much more interesting.
By the way, I ordered the new Amanda Vickery book after devouring her previous one. It was very enlightening and I have high hopes for the new one!
Deb in Wisconsin
January 27, 2010 at 2:33 pm
jfwakefield
Deb I think you will love Behind Closed Doors. It is VERY readable. I devoured it then went back and savoured every bit on a second read. If it was only available on Kindle I know I’d always have it with me!
January 28, 2010 at 3:14 am
cathyallen
I agree with Deb, above, that these are really beautiful. I have trouble imagining how they were able to create these intricate letters from IVORY, of all things. We have a few ivory objects, and they are quite fragile; carving such detail would take a real master at the craft! (I am ever the artist/crafter being amazed at how something is created, LOL!)
Thanks for the fascinating insight, Julie!
CEA
January 28, 2010 at 10:13 am
jfwakefield
Mine were made from long pieces of ivory carved into a letter and then sliced, as you do cookie dough. An intricate but fascinating process I agree.