(Funeral Procession by Thomas Rowlandson, circa 1810 )
The great Mrs. Churchill was no more…
Mrs. Churchill, after being disliked at least twenty-five years, was now spoken of with compassionate allowances. In one point she was fully justified. She had never been admitted before to be seriously ill. The event acquitted her of all the fancifulness, and all the selfishness of imaginary complaints…
Short letters from Frank were received at Randalls, communicating all that was immediately important of their state and plans. Mr. Churchill was better than could be expected; and their first removal, on the departure of the funeral for Yorkshire, was to be to the house of a very old friend in Windsor, to whom Mr. Churchill had been promising a visit the last ten years..
Emma, Chapter 45
So, poor Mrs Churchill who ruled her family with an iron fist, died in Richmond, in Surrey, after apparently really having been ill all the time. It always makes me smile that as soon as his domineering wife is dead, Mr Churchill suddenly appears free enough to be able to visit an old friend, whom he had been promising to visit for ten years! How wickedly funny Jane Austen is in those passages from Chapter 45….
On to more serious matters…..The funeral was to be in Yorkshire at the great Enscombe estate. And really we would have expected nothing else…I can imagine Mrs Churchill resting forever in some great mausoleum like the one at Castle Howard ( also in Yorkshire)
But could a corpse be transported a journey of at least 200 miles? Let’s see shall we?
In “The English Way of Death” by Julian Litten, there are some descriptions of 18th century funerals, rather in the grand manner, where the dead body was to be transported some distance for burial. The story of Edward Colston is a very interesting one.
Edward Colston died at his home in Mortlake in Surrey, near London in 1771. His funeral instruction were to the effect that his dead body was to be taken to Bristol and after having been paraded through the streets of the town he was to be buried in All Saints Church.
The journey in 1771 would have taken 6 days, involving five overnight stays at inns( and while on the road luncheons and breakfasts) for 16 attendants who attended the corpse. Together with stabling for 20 horses, shelter for the funeral car and the three mourning coaches which followed it. An extra room was taken at each inn for the corpse to lie alone, in state each night.
But before the body could embark on this journey, the Archbishop of Canterbury had first to be applied to, in order for him to give permission for the corpse to be transported from the parish in which Colston died- in the Surrey diocese -to the parish in Bristol in which he was to be buried.
The whole funeral cost £513…an enormous sum. It was also not unknown for coffins to be transported by river and canal was well as by road.
By the time Jane Austen was writing Emma, funerals for the gentry and middles classes of people were, in the main, organised by professional firms of undertakers. They were suspected of insisting on elaborate mourning rituals to increase their profits sometimes ignoring the wishes of the deceased, a situation that reached its peak in the Victorian era.
The cost and details of one funeral of a person known to Jane Austen has been transcribed by Deirdre Le Faye and published in Volume VII of Bath History (1998) and this, indeed, reflects the conflict between a desire for a simple funeral and the reality of unnecessary ritual and cost. The account of the costs of the funeral of Mrs Lillingston, a friend of the Jane Austen’s aunt and uncle, the Leigh Perrots in Bath, who left Jane Austen a legacy of £50 in 1806 (which said sum which was enough to pay all her living expenses for one whole year) makes for interesting reading.
The Bath undertakers, Ballans and Bradley of Bond Street, presented their detailed account of 8th February 1806 for her funeral costs, and though it was supposed to be done in the plainest manner according to Mrs Lillingston’s wishes, it still entailed providing expensive mourning for all Mrs lillingston’s old servants, and four horses to pull the hearse and the following mourning coach,which was thought to be essential by the undertakers. In her will Mrs Lillington had asked for only two horses to be used. The final bill for this “simple” funeral amounted to £115 and 12 shillings.
So though it was undoubtedly expensive, Mrs Churchill’s corpse could most certainly be transported back to her Enscombe estate, at least 200 miles along the Great North Road from London, provided that expense could be met (and I’m sure it could) and the Archbishop of Canterbury provided his permission.
On a slightly different tack…I think it might now be appropriate to mention that funeral arrangements and customs were slightly different in northern England and Yorkshire, where Enscombe is situated, than in other parts of the country.
A really quite quaint and interesting habit of distributing special funeral biscuits and hot red wine to the mourners existed in the North of England throughout the 17th, 18th and into the 19th centuries.
The biscuits served at northern funerals came in a variety of shapes and sizes and textures. In the 18th century/early 19th century the most fashionable type resembled Naples or Savoy biscuits, which were similar to the crisp sponge finger type biscuits -manufactured under the commercial term Boudoir or LadyBiscuits- which can be brought from confectioners shops and supermarkets today and are usually used to make the spongebase of puddings like tiramisu or trifle.
Do look at the following extract from The Gentleman’s Magazine (1802) Volume I, p 105:
At the funeral of the richer sort…they had burnt wine and Savoy biscuits, and a paper with two Naples biscuits sealed up to carry home to their families. The paper in which these biscuits were sealed ( always with black sealing wax-JFW) was printed on one side with a coffin, cross bone, skulls, hacks, spades, hour-glasses etc…
Many confectioners specialised in producing them and here are some illustrations of the wrappers which have been preserved in various museum collections in the north,and are included in Laura Mason’s book, Food and the Rites of Passage, published by the fabulous Prospect Books:
(Do note you can enlarge all these illustrations in order to see the detail, merely by clicking on them)
Sometimes mourners were met at the deceased’s house by servants prior to the funeral procession leaving for the church and were then presented with the biscuits and wine. In Lincolnshire port or sherry was the preferred drink. Sometimes the wrapped packs of biscuits were simply left on a table in the house, so that mourners could carry them to the church, each taking a package as they left with the funeral procession.
A recipe for the biscuits was published in Chesterfield, Derbyshire in 1816 in S. W. Stanley’s book The New Whole Art of Confectionery:
Funeral Biscuits
Take twenty-four eggs, three pounds of flour, and three pounds of lump sugar , which will make forty eight finger biscuits for a funeral.
As Mrs. Churchill was most definitely “of the richer sort” I feel sure the mourners at her funeral would have gone away clutching some funeral biscuits in a fancy wrapper, together with appropriate sentiments, and sealed with black sealing wax, obtained from the swankiest confectioner in Yorkshire.



































































6 comments
January 22, 2010 at 1:07 am
Margaret
I’ve not heard of this funeral “goodie bag” custom–very odd and interesting. And how enterprising for the bakeries to use the wrapper as an advertisement. Thanks for the interesting post.
January 22, 2010 at 6:17 pm
jfwakefield
My pleasure, Mrgaret. I think its quite a stylish thing to do-it might be an idea to revive the custom;-)
January 23, 2010 at 3:23 am
Cathy Allen
Huh! I’d never have thought it — the take-away biscuits, I mean. And having the wrappers is amazing; I can’t imagine how they have survived for so long!
The £513 Colson funeral kind of boggles my mind. A truly enormous amount for a funeral, of all things! I wonder about his stipulating that he was to be buried IN the church. Didn’t one need to be important to be allowed to do that? But perhaps he WAS important, and I just don’t know about him? Or maybe he just wanted to be thought important, and had the money to provide for it? Or maybe the family was hornswaggled by unscrupulous funeral directors?
Thanks Julie, very interesting reading!
CEA
January 23, 2010 at 9:13 am
jfwakefield
I suppose people kept them as keepsakes-rather in the manner that I’ve kept some of the pastillage ornaments from my wedding and children’s christening cakes…?
January 24, 2010 at 3:47 pm
caitlin
This is so interesting. The “favors” taken home to others made me think of a question we recently batted about on the L&T board about women attending funerals during that era. None of us found any clear references to site as to rules about women attending, just speculation. Perhaps these take home things were for those at home to participate in the rite of passage in a private way? Would the drinks and biscuits be supplemented by the buffet that is common at homes following a graveside service today, or did they just have the visitors beforehand, and have privacy after the burial or internment in the vault? Not to be morbid, but customs of this era have been hard for me to find – it seems that the Victorian era rules the info waves on this matter. The packages would be an interesting tradition to revive, perhaps containing a treat the deceased was particularly fond of.
January 24, 2010 at 6:01 pm
myenglishcountrygarden
The funeral customs of this era are difficult to trace, thats why this clearly referenced custom was a joy to repeat ;-) Mrs Lillingston’s funeral accounts are fascinating for they give us some idea of the workings of an upper middle class funeral of Jane Austen’s era. But there is very little information “out there” on funeral customs of our era. Ive seen some people comment that, like Christmas, this lack of information indicates there was very little going on by way of long periods of mourning etc.I think that view is entirely wrong; there is evidence for long periods of mourning (influenced by court mourning) for close relations well before our era as well as after it. And even in it if you look closely enough ;-) People of middle class status( and by that I mean the middling sort in England-the people Jane Austen in the main wrote about) would most certainly have been mourning soberly for their dead relations for long periods of time. Even in Emma six months mouring for Mrs Churchill by Frank and Jane Fairfax is seen as entirely normal and respectable behaviour.