“Mr. Martin, I suppose, is not a man of information beyond the line of his own business. He does not read?”
“Oh, yes! that is, no — I do not know — but I believe he has read a good deal — but not what you would think any thing of. He reads the Agricultural Reports and some other books, that lay in one of the window seats — but he reads all them to himself. But sometimes of an evening, before we went to cards, he would read something aloud out of the Elegant Extracts — very entertaining. And I know he had read the Vicar of Wakefield. He never read the Romance of the Forest, nor the Children of the Abbey. He had never heard of such books before I mentioned them, but he is determined to get them now as soon as ever he can.”
Emma, Chapter 4
(As ever, do remember that all the illustrations in this post can be enlarge merely by clicking on them)
The Elegant Extracts are virtually unknown today, but they provide a little clue to our understanding of the character of Robert Martin. To understand what that tiny reference to his reading habits reveals is important for anyone reading Emma today..
These books, Elegant Extracts of Prose and the companion anthology, Elegant Extracts of Verse, were collated by Vicesimus Knox.
He became the Headmaster of Tonbridge School in Kent and was famous for his liberal, enlightened views on education which were influenced by the teachings of John Locke.
George Austen, Jane Austen’s father ,was educated at this school, though he attended the school long before Knox was headmaster there. It is clear however that they seem to have shared the same enlightened view of the education of children of both sexes.
Knox promoted the reading of fiction as a means of exercising the imagination and encouraging critical and creative thought. His book Liberal Education(1781) has some interesting points to make about education, and he was particularly scathing about the shortcomings of the state of university education in the late 18th century. He also has some interesting points to make on female education-a subject that was dear to Jane Austen’s heart He disapproved of limiting a girls education to domestic concerns. He thought the female
mind is certainly as capable of improvement, as that of the other sex
And as mother, women were largely responsible (with the dishonourable exception of Mrs. Bennet) for the education of their children, it would be better for them to be well educated in a rounded manner and to be well read:
A sensible and well-educated mother is, in every respect, best qualified to instruct a child till he can read well enough to enter on the Latin grammar. I have indeed always found those boys the best readers, on their entrance on Latin, who have been prepared by a careful and accomplished mother.
He had attended St John’s College,Oxford from 1771 –1778 and seems to disapproved of the somewhat immoral regime there. He asserted in his book, that to send a son to either university without the safeguard of a private tutor would probably
“make shipwreck of his learning, his morals, his health and his fortune”.
He suggested reforms to the university system in his pamphlet A Letter to Lord North, which Knox addressed to the Oxford Chancellor in 1789. This pamphlet suggested the intervention of Parliament in the situation at the colleges, and advocated stricter discipline, reducing students reliance on personal servants, the strengthening of the collegiate system, an increase in the number of college tutors, the cost of which could be met by doubling tuition fees and abolishing “useless” professors. College tutors were to exercise a parental control over their pupils, and professors not of the “useless” order were to lecture thrice weekly in every term, or resign.
In all, he sounds rather like the type of teacher of whom George Austen would have approved. Jane Austen certainly possessed a copy of the Extracts for in 1801 she gave them to her nice Anna. (See : A Bibliography of Jane Austen by David Gilson, page 433)
Moreover, her comic poem “I’ve a pain in my head” (which was written as an account of her visit to Mr Newnham an apothecary, a relation of one of her brother Edward’s tenants in Chawton), parodied a poem entitled “The Doctor and the Patient” which is to be found in the Epigram Section of Volume IV of The Elegant Extracts in Verse:
‘I’ve a pain in my head’
Said the suffering Beckford;
To her Doctor so dread.
‘Oh! what shall I take for’t?’
Said this Doctor so dread
Whose name it was Newnham.
‘For this pain in your head
Ah! What can you do Ma’am?’
Said Miss Beckford, ‘Suppose
If you think there’s no risk,
I take a good Dose
Of calomel brisk.’–
‘What a praise worthy Notion.’
Replied Mr. Newnham.
‘You shall have such a potion
And so will I too Ma’am.’
(See The Poetry of Jane Austen and the Austen Family edited by David Selwyn, page 83)
The prose volumes were comprehensive collections of letters, orations, essays from publications such as the Rambler, Spectator and the Idler and also contain extracts from works by leading modern authors such as Gilpin , Swift, Hugh Blair, French philosophers such as Voltaire and classical authors such as Pliny.
The verse volumes were made up of the verses of famous writers of the time,-Thompson and Cowper, extracts from Shakespeare, Spencer, Johnson, Milton, Gay, poems ,ballads, epigrams, and prologues and epilogues spoken at the playhouses.
(Do note some poor scholar split his ink on my copy, above)
The books were used a standard texts in schools for years: indeed, this was the use for which Knox explicitly intended his books, for he believed in the reading of fiction as a means of exercising the imagination and critical and creative thought. As he wrote in his preface to the Verse volumes, the books
“are calculated for classical schools, and for those in which English only is taught”.
The extracts
“may be usefully read at the grammar schools, by explaining everything grammatically, historically, metrically and critically, and then giving a portion to be learned by memory’
In 1810 Wordsworth wrote that Elegant Extracts in Verse
‘is circulated everywhere and in fact constitutes at this day the poetical library of our Schools’.
By the mid 19th century however, their popularity had waned. In 1843 Robert Chambers, introducing his own Cyclopaedia of English Literature asserted that it will take the place of Knox’s Extracts which,
‘after long enjoying popularity as a selection of polite literature for youths between school and college’ has now ‘sunk out of notice’.
Vicesimus Knox’s anthologies were both expensive and popular: Elegant Extracts in Prose (1783), and Elegant Extracts in Verse (c. 1780) had each at least 15 editions, and a third collection Elegant Epistles (1790) had at least 10.
Each volume was issued in an abridged form, but these were only published in one or two editions.The unabridged volumes had each about 1000 pages and sold for five guineas the set of two volumes- one prose, one verse- which was a very considerable amount of money in the late 18th /early 19th century.
So what does this tell us about Robert Martin who reads these books? It show us that as a family the Martins were not afraid to spend money-and in quite considerable amounts- on good and improving literature. That he is, I think , certainly better read than Harriet, brought up on a limited diet of Mrs Radcliff’s sensational novels, and quite possibly, better read than Emma, whose reading lists were impressive but really do not constitute any real proof of accomplishment and improvement . Incidentally in Chapter 9, her limited knowledge of the Extracts is confirmed when Emma and Harriet are organising their great literary endeavour of collecting riddles. Her bold statement that her father’s rather risqué contribution was
“Copied from the Elegant Extracts”
proves her ignorance: it was never a part of that sensible and earnest anthology:
Kitty, a fair but frozen maid,
Kindled a flame I yet deplore,
The hood-wink’d boy I called to aid,
Though of his near approach afraid,
So fatal to my suit before.
And that is all that I can recollect of it; but it is very clever all the way through. But I think, my dear, you said you had got it.”
“Yes, papa, it is written out in our second page. We copied it from the Elegant Extracts. It was Garrick’s, you know.”
It is quite ironic that the girl who can make fine reading lists but never completes them, and has clearly never read such an improving set of volumes of the Elegant Extracts( though it would appear from her casual statement that there is a set in the Hartfield Library) can so easily dismiss a man who even though he reads only extracts of works, is probably,as a result, much better read than herself.
Jane Austen certainly approved The Extracts and of Robert Martin and his well founded and self-sacrificing attempts at self-improvement. No wonder he could write well in his letter of proposal to Harriet, a fact that so surprised Emma
She read, and was surprized. The style of the letter was much above her expectation. There were not merely no grammatical errors, but as a composition it would not have disgraced a gentleman; the language, though plain, was strong and unaffected, and the sentiments it conveyed very much to the credit of the writer. It was short, but expressed good sense, warm attachment, liberality, propriety, even delicacy of feeling.
Emma , Chapter 7
I think it is interesting that Jane Austen provides a little insight into Robert Martin ‘s true worth simply by letting us know that he purchased and read such books as these.

























































16 comments
January 17, 2010 at 12:44 pm
Raquel
Dear Vita,
I do not know the book Elegant Extracts and I did not realize how much Mr. Martin was educated. And Emma, too, deceive us by saying that probably the Mr. Martin’s letter was written by one of his sisters.
A wonderful post!
January 18, 2010 at 9:23 am
jfwakefield
She is most dreadfully naughty ,isn’t she?Emma separating Harriet and Robert Martin is one of her most heinous crimes.I’m so glad her better instincts/qualities come to the fore at the end.
January 17, 2010 at 2:54 pm
caitlin
Wow. You always amaze me. The insight you give to the l&t in this era makes these books new every time I read them. I think that my previous impression of the EE was that it was not as educational or truely improving, but more like a pretention of people trying to be better than they should be. Perhaps seeing through the Emma lens there.
January 18, 2010 at 9:28 am
jfwakefield
No,they really were important books. Though they were expensive they were very good value-the content is amazing:I’ll put up the contents list one day.And so if he’d read and understood them Robert Martin would have been much better read than Emma.
The problem for us ,IMO,at this remove of nearly 200 years is that if we (understandably) gloss over little clues in the text because they are unfamiliar,we don’t necessarily catch what Jane Austen was trying to tell us , in a very clever abut easily missable way about a certain character: in this instance that Robert Martin is not he country bumpkin that Emma immediately and with no proof suppose him to be.She stereotypes him most unfairly.
January 17, 2010 at 5:11 pm
Cathy Allen
Dear Julie,
I agree with caitlin, that you are amazing! I never would have guessed that perhaps Robert Martin was better-read than Emma. I’m not sure what I used to think the Elegant Extracts were, but you’ve enlightened me immensely, thanks!
CEA
January 18, 2010 at 9:29 am
jfwakefield
I’m so glad: its what this blog is for after all
January 17, 2010 at 6:40 pm
Laurel Ann
And as mother, women were largely responsible (with the dishonourable exception of Mrs. Bennet) for the education of their children,
LOL Julie! Just spewed coffee through nose!
Thanks for this incredible essay on the EE. Luv your images, especially the title page with the steel engraving of the 3 young boys. So beautiful. I shall never see Elegant Extracts mentioned again and not think of you!
Cheers, LA
January 18, 2010 at 9:30 am
jfwakefield
The engravings are beautiful, aren’t they? They are wonderful fully enlarged,when all the detail is revealed.
(and I’m sorry about the coffee!)
January 18, 2010 at 2:08 am
Karen
I had always realized that Robert Martin was better educated than Harriet, but I now see from yet another terrific post, Julie, that he was likely better read than our “heroine.”
What a twit Emma was!
January 18, 2010 at 9:32 am
jfwakefield
Twit is the word: even when presented with the evidence of Robert Martin’s good manners – on their chance meeting in the lane with Harreit- and the evidence of his erudition in the proposal letter to Harriet, she does not give him a second chance.Or allows herself to be proved wrong.Im so glad she improves by the end of the novel.
January 18, 2010 at 2:25 am
Ramya
Very interesting. But if Emma didn’t copy that particular charade from EE, then was she hallucinating?
Perhaps JA made a mistake (horrors!!!). However, since that is not likely, this puzzle is probably going to bother me…LOL Poor Robert Martin- to be judged by someone who was probably less well-read than himself!
January 18, 2010 at 9:38 am
jfwakefield
That’s a little joke against Emma,and its deliberate,not a mistake on JAne Austen’s part.
Emma clearly has never opened the Hartfield copies of the Extracts; if she had she would have realised that Garrick’s rude little ditty is not there ( nor ever would be included,as inappropriate for the improving home/schoolroom).
Jane Austen’s audience would have been familiar with the content of the Elegant Extracts: they would know that Emma is exposing her ignorance in her breezy little statement.
January 18, 2010 at 2:18 pm
Ramya
That’s true. People would have picked-up on Emma’s ignorance much easier than us (and I’m guessing Harriet should have too, but she was too ignorant herself). Hmm… what was Mr. Woodhouse doing, remembering dirty ditties? Seems so unlike him.
January 18, 2010 at 2:24 pm
jfwakefield
Im not sure Harriet ever read the Elegant Extracts-though she knew of them, and may have had extracts read to her at school .Im not sure the contents penetrated her brain,and she would of course never contradict Miss Woodhouse. The gothic novels of Mrs Radcliffe are more her preferred genre
As to Mr Woodhouse’s ditty-I think that is the wicked sense of humour of the author exhibiting itself;-)
January 18, 2010 at 5:51 pm
Ramya
Harriet is a horror nut!
And as to Mr. W’s ditty- you are right. JA was poking fun at him. LOL Thanks, Julie!
January 19, 2010 at 4:59 pm
jfwakefield
Thats exactly it,Ramya! Exactly it!